%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB027+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:39:16 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 43 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 206 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 53 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 272 ( 109 ~; 116 |; 38 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 96 ( 1 sgn 45 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_chain_002,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_rest,X7,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X7,X8)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X5,X7)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X5,X6) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X4,X5)
<=> ( ! [X9,X10,X11] :
( ( iext(X8,X10,X11)
& iext(X6,X9,X10) )
=> iext(X4,X9,X11) )
& ip(X8)
& ip(X6)
& ip(X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_chain_002) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_027_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_II,axiom,
? [X14,X15,X16] :
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X16,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X15,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X15,X16)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X14,X15)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X14,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_owl_sameAs,X14) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_027_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_II) ).
fof(owl_inv,axiom,
! [X6,X8] :
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X6,X8)
<=> ( ! [X1,X3] :
( iext(X6,X1,X3)
<=> iext(X8,X3,X1) )
& ip(X8)
& ip(X6) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_inv) ).
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X4)
<=> ( ! [X12,X13,X3] :
( ( iext(X4,X13,X3)
& iext(X4,X12,X3) )
=> X12 = X13 )
& ip(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X1,X3] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X3)
<=> X1 = X3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_027_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_II,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_027_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_II) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
<=> icext(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X33,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X33,X34)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X31,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X31,X32)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X30,X31)
| ~ ip(X34)
| ~ ip(X32)
| ~ ip(X30)
| ~ iext(X30,esk7_5(X30,X31,X32,X33,X34),esk9_5(X30,X31,X32,X33,X34)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X33,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X33,X34)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X31,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X31,X32)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X30,X31)
| ~ ip(X34)
| ~ ip(X32)
| ~ ip(X30)
| iext(X34,esk8_5(X30,X31,X32,X33,X34),esk9_5(X30,X31,X32,X33,X34)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X33,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X33,X34)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X31,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X31,X32)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X30,X31)
| ~ ip(X34)
| ~ ip(X32)
| ~ ip(X30)
| iext(X32,esk7_5(X30,X31,X32,X33,X34),esk8_5(X30,X31,X32,X33,X34)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X33,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X33,X34)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X31,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X31,X32)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X30,X31)
| iext(X30,X35,X37)
| ~ iext(X34,X36,X37)
| ~ iext(X32,X35,X36) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X33,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X33,X34)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X31,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X31,X32)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X30,X31)
| ip(X34) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X33,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X33,X34)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X31,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X31,X32)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X30,X31)
| ip(X32) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X33,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X33,X34)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X31,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X31,X32)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X30,X31)
| ip(X30) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_chain_002])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,esk6_0,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk5_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk5_0,esk6_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk4_0,esk5_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk4_0,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_owl_sameAs,esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_027_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_II])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X8,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X8,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X7,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X6,X7)
| ~ iext(X4,X3,X5)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| iext(X6,X2,X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk5_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ iext(X6,X2,X7)
| ~ iext(X4,X7,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,X5)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X5,X6)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X5,esk5_0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,esk5_0,X4)
| iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk5_0,esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ iext(X5,X2,X6)
| ~ iext(esk6_0,X6,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X4,X5)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X4,esk5_0)
| iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk4_0,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk4_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X47,X48)
| ~ ip(X48)
| ~ ip(X47)
| iext(X48,esk11_2(X47,X48),esk10_2(X47,X48))
| iext(X47,esk10_2(X47,X48),esk11_2(X47,X48)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X47,X48)
| ~ ip(X48)
| ~ ip(X47)
| ~ iext(X48,esk11_2(X47,X48),esk10_2(X47,X48))
| ~ iext(X47,esk10_2(X47,X48),esk11_2(X47,X48)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X41,X42)
| iext(X41,X45,X46)
| ~ iext(X42,X46,X45) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X41,X42)
| iext(X42,X44,X43)
| ~ iext(X41,X43,X44) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X41,X42)
| ip(X42) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X41,X42)
| ip(X41) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_inv])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X2,X4)
| ~ iext(esk6_0,X4,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,esk4_0)
| iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_owl_sameAs,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X4,X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| iext(X4,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,esk6_0,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(esk6_0,X3,X2)
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X2,X1)
| iext(esk6_0,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19,X20,X21] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X21)
| ~ ip(X21)
| esk1_1(X21) != esk2_1(X21) )
& ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X21)
| ~ ip(X21)
| iext(X21,esk2_1(X21),esk3_1(X21)) )
& ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X21)
| ~ ip(X21)
| iext(X21,esk1_1(X21),esk3_1(X21)) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X17)
| X18 = X19
| ~ iext(X17,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(X17,X18,X20) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X17)
| ip(X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X2,X1)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X51,X52] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X51,X52)
| X51 != X52 )
& ( X51 = X52
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X51,X52) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X3)
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk2_1(X1),esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,esk3_1(uri_ex_p))
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,esk2_1(uri_ex_p),X1)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).
fof(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_027_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_II]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,esk3_1(uri_ex_p))
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| esk2_1(uri_ex_p) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
fof(c_0_35,plain,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X28,X29)
| ~ icext(X29,X28) )
& ( icext(X29,X28)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X28,X29) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| esk2_1(uri_ex_p) = esk1_1(uri_ex_p) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_28])]) ).
fof(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWB027+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.47 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.47 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:41:20 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.67 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % new_bool_1 with pid 287638 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.25/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.67 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.67 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.67 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % SubtermCWHack with pid 287646 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.67 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.67 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.67 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.67 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.67
% 0.25/0.67 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/0.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.67 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.25/0.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Initial clauses : 29
% 0.25/0.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.25/0.67 % Processed clauses : 159
% 0.25/0.67 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.25/0.67 % ...subsumed : 32
% 0.25/0.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 126
% 0.25/0.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.25/0.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.25/0.67 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.25/0.67 % Generated clauses : 233
% 0.25/0.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 207
% 0.25/0.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 0.25/0.67 % Paramodulations : 232
% 0.25/0.67 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.25/0.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Total rewrite steps : 74
% 0.25/0.67 % ...of those cached : 60
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 111
% 0.25/0.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.25/0.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 95
% 0.25/0.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75
% 0.25/0.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 507
% 0.25/0.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.25/0.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3971
% 0.25/0.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1104
% 0.25/0.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 46
% 0.25/0.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 164
% 0.25/0.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.25/0.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.25/0.67 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7309
% 0.25/0.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 549
% 0.25/0.67
% 0.25/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.67 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.25/0.67 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.25/0.67 % Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.25/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.25/0.67
% 0.25/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.67 % User time : 0.034 s
% 0.25/0.67 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.25/0.67 % Total time : 0.045 s
% 0.25/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.67 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------