%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB030+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 21.28s 7.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 21.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 91 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 98 ( 37 ~; 36 |; 18 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 2 sgn 21 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) )
& ic(X5)
& ic(X11) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_bool_complementof_class) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_030_Bad_Class,axiom,
? [X42] :
( iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X42,literal_typed(dat_str_true,uri_xsd_boolean))
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X42,uri_rdf_type)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,X42,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_c,X42)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_030_Bad_Class) ).
fof(owl_restrict_hasself,axiom,
! [X11,X2,X31] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X11,X2)
& iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X11,X31) )
=> ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> iext(X2,X4,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_restrict_hasself) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) )
& ic(X5)
& ic(X11) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_bool_complementof_class]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X253,X254,X255] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| icext(X253,X255)
| icext(X254,X255) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| ~ icext(X254,X255)
| ~ icext(X253,X255) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| ic(X254) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| ic(X253) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,esk192_0,literal_typed(dat_str_true,uri_xsd_boolean))
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,esk192_0,uri_rdf_type)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,esk192_0,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_c,esk192_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_030_Bad_Class])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X532,X533,X534,X535] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X532,X533)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X532,X534)
| icext(X532,X535)
| ~ iext(X533,X535,X535) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X532,X533)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X532,X534)
| iext(X533,X535,X535)
| ~ icext(X532,X535) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_restrict_hasself])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X49,X50] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X49,X50)
| ~ icext(X50,X49) )
& ( icext(X50,X49)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X49,X50) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X3,X1)
| icext(X3,X2)
| icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_c,esk192_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X2)
| icext(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,esk192_0,literal_typed(dat_str_true,uri_xsd_boolean)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( icext(esk192_0,X1)
| icext(uri_ex_c,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ iext(X2,X1,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,esk192_0,X2)
| icext(esk192_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,esk192_0,uri_rdf_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_c)
| icext(esk192_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X1,X4)
| ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(X3,X2,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X1)
| icext(esk192_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,esk192_0)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,esk192_0,X1)
| ~ icext(esk192_0,X2)
| iext(X1,X2,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
icext(esk192_0,uri_ex_c),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,esk192_0,X1)
| iext(X1,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_ex_c,X1)
| ~ icext(esk192_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
~ icext(uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB030+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:42:40 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.28/7.59 % Version: 3.5.1
% 21.28/7.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 21.28/7.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % new_bool_3 with pid 1370721 completed with status 9
% 21.28/7.59 % new_bool_1 with pid 1370722 completed with status 9
% 21.28/7.59 % sh5l with pid 1370723 completed with status 9
% 21.28/7.59 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1370720 completed with status 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 21.28/7.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 21.28/7.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 21.28/7.59 % No SInE strategy applied
% 21.28/7.59 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 21.28/7.59 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 21.28/7.59 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1370764 completed with status 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 21.28/7.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 21.28/7.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 21.28/7.59 % No SInE strategy applied
% 21.28/7.59 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 21.28/7.59 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 21.28/7.59 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 21.28/7.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 21.28/7.59
% 21.28/7.59 % Proof found!
% 21.28/7.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 21.28/7.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 21.28/7.59 % Parsed axioms : 559
% 21.28/7.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Initial clauses : 1271
% 21.28/7.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 21.28/7.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1160
% 21.28/7.59 % Processed clauses : 25424
% 21.28/7.59 % ...of these trivial : 732
% 21.28/7.59 % ...subsumed : 11916
% 21.28/7.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 12776
% 21.28/7.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 21.28/7.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Backward-subsumed : 27
% 21.28/7.59 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 21.28/7.59 % Generated clauses : 231330
% 21.28/7.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 209283
% 21.28/7.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 17
% 21.28/7.59 % Paramodulations : 231314
% 21.28/7.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % NegExts : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 21.28/7.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Total rewrite steps : 22531
% 21.28/7.59 % ...of those cached : 18797
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 21.28/7.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 21.28/7.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 21.28/7.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 21.28/7.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 21.28/7.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 12723
% 21.28/7.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4526
% 21.28/7.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Negative unit clauses : 12
% 21.28/7.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 8185
% 21.28/7.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 185013
% 21.28/7.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 557863
% 21.28/7.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 38
% 21.28/7.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10273939
% 21.28/7.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7926765
% 21.28/7.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9934
% 21.28/7.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2306906
% 21.28/7.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 99613
% 21.28/7.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 21.28/7.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 21.28/7.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4076235
% 21.28/7.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19101
% 21.28/7.59
% 21.28/7.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 21.28/7.59 % User time : 6.863 s
% 21.28/7.59 % System time : 0.236 s
% 21.28/7.59 % Total time : 7.099 s
% 21.28/7.59 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 21.28/7.59
% 21.28/7.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 21.28/7.59 % User time : 20.652 s
% 21.28/7.59 % System time : 0.682 s
% 21.28/7.59 % Total time : 21.334 s
% 21.28/7.59 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 21.28/7.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------