↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWB030+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:31 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SWB030+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.31  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 17:51:09 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.53  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.58  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.46/0.58  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.58  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.46/0.58  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.46/0.58  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.46/0.58  
% 0.46/0.58  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.46/0.58  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.46/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  % File     : SWB030+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.46/0.59  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.46/0.59  % Problem  : Bad Class
% 0.46/0.59  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.46/0.59  % English  :
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.46/0.59  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.46/0.59  % Names    : 030_Bad_Class [Sch11]
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.59  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.2.0
% 0.46/0.59  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   4 avg)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   1   ~;   0   |;   7   &)
% 0.46/0.59  %                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   7 avg)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of variables   :   10 (   9   !;   1   ?)
% 0.46/0.59  % SPC      : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  % Comments :
% 0.46/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ! [X,C] :
% 0.46/0.59        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 0.46/0.59      <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  fof(owl_restrict_hasself,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ! [Z,P,V] :
% 0.46/0.59        ( ( iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,Z,V)
% 0.46/0.59          & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,Z,P) )
% 0.46/0.59       => ! [X] :
% 0.46/0.59            ( icext(Z,X)
% 0.46/0.59          <=> iext(P,X,X) ) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ! [Z,C] :
% 0.46/0.59        ( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,Z,C)
% 0.46/0.59       => ( ic(Z)
% 0.46/0.59          & ic(C)
% 0.46/0.59          & ! [X] :
% 0.46/0.59              ( icext(Z,X)
% 0.46/0.59            <=> ~ icext(C,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_030_Bad_Class,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ? [BNODE_x] :
% 0.46/0.59        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class)
% 0.46/0.59        & iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_c,BNODE_x)
% 0.46/0.59        & iext(uri_rdf_type,BNODE_x,uri_owl_Restriction)
% 0.46/0.59        & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,BNODE_x,uri_rdf_type)
% 0.46/0.59        & iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,BNODE_x,literal_typed(dat_str_true,uri_xsd_boolean)) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.46/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.59  %ClaNum:13(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.46/0.59  %VarNum:44(SingletonVarNum:22)
% 0.46/0.59  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.46/0.59  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.46/0.59  %SharedTerms:16
% 0.46/0.59  [1]P1(a1,a2,a6)
% 0.46/0.59  [2]P1(a1,a3,a7)
% 0.46/0.59  [3]P1(a8,a3,a1)
% 0.46/0.59  [4]P1(a9,a2,a3)
% 0.46/0.59  [5]P1(a10,a3,f5(a4,a11))
% 0.46/0.59  [6]~P2(x62,x61)+P1(a1,x61,x62)
% 0.46/0.59  [7]P3(x71)+~P1(a9,x72,x71)
% 0.46/0.59  [8]P3(x81)+~P1(a9,x81,x82)
% 0.46/0.59  [9]P2(x91,x92)+~P1(a1,x92,x91)
% 0.46/0.59  [10]P2(x101,x102)+P2(x103,x102)+~P1(a9,x101,x103)
% 0.46/0.59  [11]~P2(x111,x112)+~P2(x113,x112)+~P1(a9,x113,x111)
% 0.46/0.59  [12]P1(x121,x122,x122)+~P2(x123,x122)+~P1(a8,x123,x121)+~P1(a10,x123,x124)
% 0.46/0.59  [13]P2(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x132,x132)+~P1(a8,x131,x133)+~P1(a10,x131,x134)
% 0.46/0.59  %EqnAxiom
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(16,plain,
% 0.46/0.59     (P2(a2,x161)+P2(a3,x161)),
% 0.46/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,9,10])).
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.46/0.59     (~P1(a1,x201,x201)+P2(a3,x201)),
% 0.46/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,9,10,11,13])).
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.46/0.59     (~P2(a3,x251)+~P2(a2,x251)),
% 0.46/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,9,11])).
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (P2(x341,x341)+~P2(a3,x341)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,12,9])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(39,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P2(a3,a2)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,25])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     ($false),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[39,16,20,6]),
% 0.46/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.46/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.60  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------