%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB031+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:28 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.51s 9.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 18 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 110 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 127 ( 50 ~; 49 |; 22 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 9 sgn 25 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X21] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> X4 = X21 )
& ic(X11) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_enum_class_001) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_031_Large_Universe,axiom,
? [X42,X43] :
( iext(uri_rdf_rest,X43,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X43,uri_ex_w)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X42,X43)
& iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_owl_Thing,X42) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_031_Large_Universe) ).
fof(owl_class_thing_ext,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X4)
<=> ir(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_class_thing_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_ir) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_equivalentclass,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X13,X15)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X13,X4)
<=> icext(X15,X4) )
& ic(X15)
& ic(X13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_equivalentclass) ).
fof(owl_class_nothing_ext,axiom,
! [X4] : ~ icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_class_nothing_ext) ).
fof(owl_ndis_alldifferent_distinctmembers_fi_000,axiom,
? [X11] :
( iext(uri_owl_distinctMembers,X11,uri_rdf_nil)
& icext(uri_owl_AllDifferent,X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_ndis_alldifferent_distinctmembers_fi_000) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X351,X352,X353,X354,X355] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X352,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X352,X353)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X351,X352)
| ~ ic(X351)
| esk11_3(X351,X352,X353) = X353
| icext(X351,esk11_3(X351,X352,X353)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X352,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X352,X353)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X351,X352)
| ~ ic(X351)
| esk11_3(X351,X352,X353) != X353
| ~ icext(X351,esk11_3(X351,X352,X353)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X352,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X352,X353)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X351,X352)
| icext(X351,X355)
| X355 != X353 )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X352,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X352,X353)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X351,X352)
| X354 = X353
| ~ icext(X351,X354) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X352,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X352,X353)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X351,X352)
| ic(X351) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_001])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk193_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk193_0,uri_ex_w)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk192_0,esk193_0)
& iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_owl_Thing,esk192_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_031_Large_Universe])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X144] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X144)
| ~ ir(X144) )
& ( ir(X144)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Thing,X144) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_class_thing_ext])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X47] : ir(X47),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X4,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X4,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X1,X4)
| ~ icext(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk193_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X816,X817,X818,X819,X820,X821] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X820,X821)
| ~ ic(X821)
| ~ ic(X820)
| icext(X821,esk116_2(X820,X821))
| icext(X820,esk116_2(X820,X821)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X820,X821)
| ~ ic(X821)
| ~ ic(X820)
| ~ icext(X821,esk116_2(X820,X821))
| ~ icext(X820,esk116_2(X820,X821)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X816,X817)
| icext(X816,X819)
| ~ icext(X817,X819) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X816,X817)
| icext(X817,X818)
| ~ icext(X816,X818) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X816,X817)
| ic(X817) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X816,X817)
| ic(X816) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_equivalentclass])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ ir(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_Thing,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X3,esk193_0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,esk193_0,X2)
| ~ icext(X3,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk193_0,uri_ex_w),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X1,X2)
| icext(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_owl_Thing,esk192_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Thing,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X4] : ~ icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X4),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_class_nothing_ext]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk193_0)
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| X1 = uri_ex_w ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk192_0,esk193_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
icext(esk192_0,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X135] : ~ icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X135),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
X1 = uri_ex_w,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_distinctMembers,esk121_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& icext(uri_owl_AllDifferent,esk121_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[owl_ndis_alldifferent_distinctmembers_fi_000])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
~ icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
icext(uri_owl_AllDifferent,esk121_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
~ icext(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWB031+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.57 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.57 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.57 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.57 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:43:29 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.57 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.57 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.51/9.33 % Version: 3.5.1
% 7.51/9.33 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 7.51/9.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % new_bool_1 with pid 508355 completed with status 9
% 7.51/9.33 % new_bool_3 with pid 508354 completed with status 9
% 7.51/9.33 % sh5l with pid 508356 completed with status 9
% 7.51/9.33 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 508353 completed with status 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 7.51/9.33 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 7.51/9.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.51/9.33 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.51/9.33 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 7.51/9.33 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 7.51/9.33 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 508397 completed with status 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 7.51/9.33 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 7.51/9.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.51/9.33 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.51/9.33 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 7.51/9.33 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 7.51/9.33 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 7.51/9.33 % Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 7.51/9.33
% 7.51/9.33 % Proof found!
% 7.51/9.33 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.51/9.33 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.51/9.33 % Parsed axioms : 559
% 7.51/9.33 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Initial clauses : 1270
% 7.51/9.33 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 7.51/9.33 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1159
% 7.51/9.33 % Processed clauses : 18256
% 7.51/9.33 % ...of these trivial : 432
% 7.51/9.33 % ...subsumed : 9354
% 7.51/9.33 % ...remaining for further processing : 8470
% 7.51/9.33 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 7.51/9.33 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Backward-subsumed : 265
% 7.51/9.33 % Backward-rewritten : 1862
% 7.51/9.33 % Generated clauses : 134220
% 7.51/9.33 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 117815
% 7.51/9.33 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% 7.51/9.33 % Paramodulations : 133620
% 7.51/9.33 % Factorizations : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % NegExts : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 7.51/9.33 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Total rewrite steps : 20999
% 7.51/9.33 % ...of those cached : 16546
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional check models : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 7.51/9.33 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 7.51/9.33 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 7.51/9.33 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 7.51/9.33 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 7.51/9.33 % Current number of processed clauses : 5743
% 7.51/9.33 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3425
% 7.51/9.33 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 7.51/9.33 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 7.51/9.33 % Non-unit-clauses : 2313
% 7.51/9.33 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 100717
% 7.51/9.33 % ...number of literals in the above : 200095
% 7.51/9.33 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Current number of archived clauses : 2712
% 7.51/9.33 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5838593
% 7.51/9.33 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4692171
% 7.51/9.33 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8142
% 7.51/9.33 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1216259
% 7.51/9.33 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 323
% 7.51/9.33 % BW rewrite match attempts : 89601
% 7.51/9.33 % BW rewrite match successes : 2348
% 7.51/9.33 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Condensation successes : 0
% 7.51/9.33 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1591356
% 7.51/9.33 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19101
% 7.51/9.33
% 7.51/9.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.51/9.33 % User time : 3.534 s
% 7.51/9.33 % System time : 0.130 s
% 7.51/9.33 % Total time : 3.664 s
% 7.51/9.33 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 7.51/9.33
% 7.51/9.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.51/9.33 % User time : 10.576 s
% 7.51/9.33 % System time : 0.419 s
% 7.51/9.33 % Total time : 10.995 s
% 7.51/9.33 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 7.51/9.33 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------