%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWB031+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n006.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:32 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.71s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.60s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWB031+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 17:26:24 EDT 2024 % 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.59/0.64 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.60/0.71 %------------------------------------------- % 0.60/0.71 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.60/0.71 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.60/0.71 % Transform :cnf % 0.60/0.71 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.60/0.71 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s % 0.60/0.71 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s % 0.60/0.71 %------------------------------------------- % 0.60/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.60/0.71 % File : SWB031+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.60/0.71 % Domain : Semantic Web % 0.60/0.71 % Problem : Large Universe % 0.60/0.71 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete. % 0.60/0.71 % English : % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.60/0.71 % Source : [Sch11] % 0.60/0.71 % Names : 031_Large_Universe [Sch11] % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.60/0.71 % Rating : 0.14 v8.2.0, 0.00 v5.2.0 % 0.60/0.71 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 2 unt; 0 def) % 0.60/0.71 % Number of atoms : 19 ( 1 equ) % 0.60/0.71 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 3 avg) % 0.60/0.71 % Number of connectives : 14 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 7 &) % 0.60/0.71 % ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.60/0.71 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg) % 0.60/0.71 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.60/0.71 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty) % 0.60/0.71 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.60/0.71 % Number of variables : 12 ( 10 !; 2 ?) % 0.60/0.71 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 % Comments : % 0.60/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.60/0.71 fof(simple_ir,axiom, % 0.60/0.71 ! [X] : ir(X) ). % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 fof(owl_class_thing_ext,axiom, % 0.60/0.71 ! [X] : % 0.60/0.71 ( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X) % 0.60/0.71 <=> ir(X) ) ). % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 fof(owl_class_nothing_ext,axiom, % 0.60/0.71 ! [X] : ~ icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X) ). % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom, % 0.60/0.71 ! [Z,S1,A1] : % 0.60/0.71 ( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,S1,A1) % 0.60/0.71 & iext(uri_rdf_rest,S1,uri_rdf_nil) ) % 0.60/0.71 => ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,Z,S1) % 0.60/0.71 <=> ( ic(Z) % 0.60/0.71 & ! [X] : % 0.60/0.71 ( icext(Z,X) % 0.60/0.71 <=> X = A1 ) ) ) ) ). % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 fof(owl_eqdis_equivalentclass,axiom, % 0.60/0.71 ! [C1,C2] : % 0.60/0.71 ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,C1,C2) % 0.60/0.71 <=> ( ic(C1) % 0.60/0.71 & ic(C2) % 0.60/0.71 & ! [X] : % 0.60/0.71 ( icext(C1,X) % 0.60/0.71 <=> icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ). % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_031_Large_Universe,axiom, % 0.60/0.71 ? [BNODE_x,BNODE_l] : % 0.60/0.71 ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_owl_Thing,BNODE_x) % 0.60/0.71 & iext(uri_owl_oneOf,BNODE_x,BNODE_l) % 0.60/0.71 & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l,uri_ex_w) % 0.60/0.71 & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l,uri_rdf_nil) ) ). % 0.60/0.71 % 0.60/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.60/0.71 %------------------------------------------- % 0.60/0.71 % Proof found % 0.60/0.71 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.60/0.71 % SZS output start Proof % 0.60/0.71 %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:14) % 0.60/0.71 %VarNum:92(SingletonVarNum:33) % 0.60/0.71 %MaxLitNum:6 % 0.60/0.71 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.60/0.71 %SharedTerms:14 % 0.60/0.71 [16]P3(a8,a2,a6) % 0.60/0.71 [17]P3(a11,a2,a12) % 0.60/0.71 [18]P3(a9,a3,a2) % 0.60/0.71 [19]P3(a10,a1,a3) % 0.60/0.71 [15]P1(a1,x151) % 0.60/0.71 [20]~P1(a7,x201) % 0.60/0.71 [21]P2(x211)+~P3(a10,x212,x211) % 0.60/0.71 [22]P2(x221)+~P3(a10,x221,x222) % 0.60/0.71 [23]P1(x231,x232)+~P1(x233,x232)+~P3(a10,x231,x233) % 0.60/0.72 [24]P1(x241,x242)+~P1(x243,x242)+~P3(a10,x243,x241) % 0.60/0.72 [27]P2(x271)+~P3(a9,x271,x272)+~P3(a8,x272,x273)+~P3(a11,x272,a12) % 0.60/0.72 [25]~P2(x252)+~P2(x251)+P3(a10,x251,x252)+P1(x252,f4(x251,x252))+P1(x251,f4(x251,x252)) % 0.60/0.72 [26]~P2(x262)+~P2(x261)+P3(a10,x261,x262)+~P1(x262,f4(x261,x262))+~P1(x261,f4(x261,x262)) % 0.60/0.72 [28]P1(x281,x282)+~E(x282,x283)+~P3(a9,x281,x284)+~P3(a8,x284,x283)+~P3(a11,x284,a12) % 0.60/0.72 [29]E(x291,x292)+~P1(x293,x291)+~P3(a9,x293,x294)+~P3(a8,x294,x292)+~P3(a11,x294,a12) % 0.60/0.72 [30]~P2(x301)+P3(a9,x301,x302)+~P3(a8,x302,x303)+E(f5(x301,x302,x303),x303)+P1(x301,f5(x301,x302,x303))+~P3(a11,x302,a12) % 0.60/0.72 [31]~P2(x311)+~P3(a8,x312,x313)+P3(a9,x311,x312)+~E(f5(x311,x312,x313),x313)+~P1(x311,f5(x311,x312,x313))+~P3(a11,x312,a12) % 0.60/0.72 %EqnAxiom % 0.60/0.72 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.60/0.72 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.60/0.72 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.60/0.72 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f4(x41,x43),f4(x42,x43)) % 0.60/0.72 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x53,x51),f4(x53,x52)) % 0.60/0.72 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61,x63,x64),f5(x62,x63,x64)) % 0.60/0.72 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x73,x71,x74),f5(x73,x72,x74)) % 0.60/0.72 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x83,x84,x81),f5(x83,x84,x82)) % 0.60/0.72 [9]P1(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x91,x93) % 0.60/0.72 [10]P1(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x101) % 0.60/0.72 [11]P3(x112,x113,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x111,x113,x114) % 0.60/0.72 [12]P3(x123,x122,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x123,x121,x124) % 0.60/0.72 [13]P3(x133,x134,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x134,x131) % 0.60/0.72 [14]~P2(x141)+P2(x142)+~E(x141,x142) % 0.60/0.72 % 0.60/0.72 %------------------------------------------- % 0.60/0.72 cnf(33,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (P2(a3)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,21])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(37,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (P1(a3,x371)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,19,21,22,24])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(40,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (P1(a1,x401)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(rename_variables,[],[15])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(43,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (P1(a1,x431)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(rename_variables,[],[15])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(45,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (E(x451,a6)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,40,20,16,17,18,19,21,22,24,9,26,29])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(50,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (E(a6,f5(a1,a2,a6))), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,40,43,20,16,17,18,19,21,22,24,9,26,29,31,2])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(56,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (E(a6,x561)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[45,2])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(57,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (E(x571,f5(a1,a2,a6))), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[45,50,2,3])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(59,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (E(x591,a6)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(rename_variables,[],[45])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(61,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (E(x611,a6)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(rename_variables,[],[45])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(63,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (E(x631,a6)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(rename_variables,[],[45])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(66,plain, % 0.60/0.72 (~E(a3,a7)), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,37,45,59,61,63,50,33,20,2,3,11,12,13,14,9])). % 0.60/0.72 cnf(81,plain, % 0.60/0.72 ($false), % 0.60/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[57,56,66,45,2,3]), % 0.60/0.72 ['proof']). % 0.60/0.72 % SZS output end Proof % 0.60/0.72 % Total time :0.010000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------