↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWB031+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SWB031+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 17:26:24 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.59/0.64  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.71  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.60/0.71  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.71  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.60/0.71  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.60/0.71  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.60/0.71  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.60/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.71  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.71  % File     : SWB031+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.60/0.71  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.60/0.71  % Problem  : Large Universe
% 0.60/0.71  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.60/0.71  % English  :
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.60/0.71  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.60/0.71  % Names    : 031_Large_Universe [Sch11]
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.60/0.71  % Rating   : 0.14 v8.2.0, 0.00 v5.2.0
% 0.60/0.71  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Number of atoms       :   19 (   1 equ)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Number of connectives :   14 (   1   ~;   0   |;   7   &)
% 0.60/0.71  %                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.60/0.71  %            Number of variables   :   12 (  10   !;   2   ?)
% 0.60/0.71  % SPC      : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  % Comments :
% 0.60/0.71  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.71  fof(simple_ir,axiom,
% 0.60/0.71      ! [X] : ir(X) ).
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  fof(owl_class_thing_ext,axiom,
% 0.60/0.71      ! [X] :
% 0.60/0.71        ( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X)
% 0.60/0.71      <=> ir(X) ) ).
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  fof(owl_class_nothing_ext,axiom,
% 0.60/0.71      ! [X] : ~ icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X) ).
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
% 0.60/0.71      ! [Z,S1,A1] :
% 0.60/0.71        ( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,S1,A1)
% 0.60/0.71          & iext(uri_rdf_rest,S1,uri_rdf_nil) )
% 0.60/0.71       => ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,Z,S1)
% 0.60/0.71        <=> ( ic(Z)
% 0.60/0.71            & ! [X] :
% 0.60/0.71                ( icext(Z,X)
% 0.60/0.71              <=> X = A1 ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  fof(owl_eqdis_equivalentclass,axiom,
% 0.60/0.71      ! [C1,C2] :
% 0.60/0.71        ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,C1,C2)
% 0.60/0.71      <=> ( ic(C1)
% 0.60/0.71          & ic(C2)
% 0.60/0.71          & ! [X] :
% 0.60/0.71              ( icext(C1,X)
% 0.60/0.71            <=> icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_031_Large_Universe,axiom,
% 0.60/0.71      ? [BNODE_x,BNODE_l] :
% 0.60/0.71        ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_owl_Thing,BNODE_x)
% 0.60/0.71        & iext(uri_owl_oneOf,BNODE_x,BNODE_l)
% 0.60/0.71        & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l,uri_ex_w)
% 0.60/0.71        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l,uri_rdf_nil) ) ).
% 0.60/0.71  
% 0.60/0.71  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.71  % Proof found
% 0.60/0.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.71  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.71  %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:14)
% 0.60/0.71  %VarNum:92(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 0.60/0.71  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.60/0.71  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.60/0.71  %SharedTerms:14
% 0.60/0.71  [16]P3(a8,a2,a6)
% 0.60/0.71  [17]P3(a11,a2,a12)
% 0.60/0.71  [18]P3(a9,a3,a2)
% 0.60/0.71  [19]P3(a10,a1,a3)
% 0.60/0.71  [15]P1(a1,x151)
% 0.60/0.71  [20]~P1(a7,x201)
% 0.60/0.71  [21]P2(x211)+~P3(a10,x212,x211)
% 0.60/0.71  [22]P2(x221)+~P3(a10,x221,x222)
% 0.60/0.71  [23]P1(x231,x232)+~P1(x233,x232)+~P3(a10,x231,x233)
% 0.60/0.72  [24]P1(x241,x242)+~P1(x243,x242)+~P3(a10,x243,x241)
% 0.60/0.72  [27]P2(x271)+~P3(a9,x271,x272)+~P3(a8,x272,x273)+~P3(a11,x272,a12)
% 0.60/0.72  [25]~P2(x252)+~P2(x251)+P3(a10,x251,x252)+P1(x252,f4(x251,x252))+P1(x251,f4(x251,x252))
% 0.60/0.72  [26]~P2(x262)+~P2(x261)+P3(a10,x261,x262)+~P1(x262,f4(x261,x262))+~P1(x261,f4(x261,x262))
% 0.60/0.72  [28]P1(x281,x282)+~E(x282,x283)+~P3(a9,x281,x284)+~P3(a8,x284,x283)+~P3(a11,x284,a12)
% 0.60/0.72  [29]E(x291,x292)+~P1(x293,x291)+~P3(a9,x293,x294)+~P3(a8,x294,x292)+~P3(a11,x294,a12)
% 0.60/0.72  [30]~P2(x301)+P3(a9,x301,x302)+~P3(a8,x302,x303)+E(f5(x301,x302,x303),x303)+P1(x301,f5(x301,x302,x303))+~P3(a11,x302,a12)
% 0.60/0.72  [31]~P2(x311)+~P3(a8,x312,x313)+P3(a9,x311,x312)+~E(f5(x311,x312,x313),x313)+~P1(x311,f5(x311,x312,x313))+~P3(a11,x312,a12)
% 0.60/0.72  %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.72  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.60/0.72  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.60/0.72  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.60/0.72  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f4(x41,x43),f4(x42,x43))
% 0.60/0.72  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x53,x51),f4(x53,x52))
% 0.60/0.72  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61,x63,x64),f5(x62,x63,x64))
% 0.60/0.72  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x73,x71,x74),f5(x73,x72,x74))
% 0.60/0.72  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x83,x84,x81),f5(x83,x84,x82))
% 0.60/0.72  [9]P1(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x91,x93)
% 0.60/0.72  [10]P1(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x101)
% 0.60/0.72  [11]P3(x112,x113,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x111,x113,x114)
% 0.60/0.72  [12]P3(x123,x122,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x123,x121,x124)
% 0.60/0.72  [13]P3(x133,x134,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x134,x131)
% 0.60/0.72  [14]~P2(x141)+P2(x142)+~E(x141,x142)
% 0.60/0.72  
% 0.60/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (P2(a3)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,21])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (P1(a3,x371)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,19,21,22,24])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (P1(a1,x401)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(rename_variables,[],[15])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (P1(a1,x431)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(rename_variables,[],[15])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (E(x451,a6)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,40,20,16,17,18,19,21,22,24,9,26,29])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(50,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (E(a6,f5(a1,a2,a6))),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,40,43,20,16,17,18,19,21,22,24,9,26,29,31,2])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(56,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (E(a6,x561)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,2])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (E(x571,f5(a1,a2,a6))),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,50,2,3])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(59,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (E(x591,a6)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(rename_variables,[],[45])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(61,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (E(x611,a6)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(rename_variables,[],[45])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(63,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (E(x631,a6)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(rename_variables,[],[45])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(66,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     (~E(a3,a7)),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,37,45,59,61,63,50,33,20,2,3,11,12,13,14,9])).
% 0.60/0.72  cnf(81,plain,
% 0.60/0.72     ($false),
% 0.60/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[57,56,66,45,2,3]),
% 0.60/0.72     ['proof']).
% 0.60/0.72  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.72  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------