%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:32 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 58.59s 58.79s % Output : CNFRefutation 58.70s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 18:01:09 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.59/58.78 %------------------------------------------- % 58.59/58.78 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.59/58.78 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.59/58.78 % Transform :cnf % 58.59/58.78 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.59/58.78 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.59/58.78 % 58.59/58.78 % Result :Theorem 58.060000s % 58.59/58.78 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.060000s % 58.59/58.78 %------------------------------------------- % 58.59/58.79 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 58.59/58.79 % File : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 58.59/58.79 % Domain : Semantic Web % 58.59/58.79 % Problem : Datatype Relationships % 58.59/58.79 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete. % 58.59/58.79 % English : % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.59/58.79 % Source : [Sch11] % 58.59/58.79 % Names : 032_Datatype_Relationships [Sch11] % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 % Status : Theorem % 58.59/58.79 % Rating : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.4.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0 % 58.59/58.79 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 def) % 58.59/58.79 % Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ) % 58.59/58.79 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg) % 58.59/58.79 % Number of connectives : 17 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 7 &) % 58.59/58.79 % ( 2 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 58.59/58.79 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg) % 58.59/58.79 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 58.59/58.79 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty) % 58.59/58.79 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty) % 58.59/58.79 % Number of variables : 12 ( 12 !; 0 ?) % 58.59/58.79 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 % Comments : % 58.59/58.79 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_string_type,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 idc(uri_xsd_string) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_decimal_type,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 idc(uri_xsd_decimal) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_integer_type,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 idc(uri_xsd_integer) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_disjoint_plainliteral_real,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ~ ( icext(uri_rdf_PlainLiteral,X) % 58.59/58.79 & icext(uri_owl_real,X) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_string_plainliteral,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ( icext(uri_xsd_string,X) % 58.59/58.79 => icext(uri_rdf_PlainLiteral,X) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_rational_real,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ( icext(uri_owl_rational,X) % 58.59/58.79 => icext(uri_owl_real,X) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_decimal_rational,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ( icext(uri_xsd_decimal,X) % 58.59/58.79 => icext(uri_owl_rational,X) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_integer_decimal,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ( icext(uri_xsd_integer,X) % 58.59/58.79 => icext(uri_xsd_decimal,X) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_parts_idc_cond_set,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ( idc(X) % 58.59/58.79 => ic(X) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [C1,C2] : % 58.59/58.79 ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,C1,C2) % 58.59/58.79 <=> ( ic(C1) % 58.59/58.79 & ic(C2) % 58.59/58.79 & ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ( icext(C1,X) % 58.59/58.79 => icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom, % 58.59/58.79 ! [C1,C2] : % 58.59/58.79 ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,C1,C2) % 58.59/58.79 <=> ( ic(C1) % 58.59/58.79 & ic(C2) % 58.59/58.79 & ! [X] : % 58.59/58.79 ~ ( icext(C1,X) % 58.59/58.79 & icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_032_Datatype_Relationships,conjecture, % 58.59/58.79 ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string) % 58.59/58.79 & iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal) ) ). % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 58.59/58.79 %------------------------------------------- % 58.59/58.79 % Proof found % 58.59/58.79 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.59/58.79 % SZS output start Proof % 58.59/58.79 %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.59/58.79 %VarNum:64(SingletonVarNum:28) % 58.59/58.79 %MaxLitNum:4 % 58.59/58.79 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.59/58.79 %SharedTerms:13 % 58.59/58.79 %goalClause: 20 % 58.59/58.79 [1]P1(a1) % 58.59/58.79 [2]P1(a2) % 58.59/58.79 [3]P1(a10) % 58.59/58.79 [20]~P4(a9,a10,a2)+~P4(a6,a2,a1) % 58.59/58.79 [4]~P1(x41)+P2(x41) % 58.59/58.79 [5]~P3(a10,x51)+P3(a2,x51) % 58.59/58.79 [6]~P3(a1,x61)+P3(a3,x61) % 58.59/58.79 [7]~P3(a5,x71)+P3(a4,x71) % 58.59/58.79 [8]~P3(a2,x81)+P3(a5,x81) % 58.59/58.79 [9]~P3(a4,x91)+~P3(a3,x91) % 58.59/58.79 [10]P2(x101)+~P4(a9,x102,x101) % 58.59/58.79 [11]P2(x111)+~P4(a9,x111,x112) % 58.59/58.79 [12]P2(x121)+~P4(a6,x122,x121) % 58.59/58.79 [13]P2(x131)+~P4(a6,x131,x132) % 58.59/58.79 [17]P3(x171,x172)+~P3(x173,x172)+~P4(a9,x173,x171) % 58.59/58.79 [18]~P3(x181,x182)+~P3(x183,x182)+~P4(a6,x183,x181) % 58.59/58.79 [14]~P2(x142)+~P2(x141)+P4(a9,x141,x142)+P3(x141,f7(x141,x142)) % 58.59/58.79 [15]~P2(x151)+~P2(x152)+P4(a6,x151,x152)+P3(x152,f8(x151,x152)) % 58.59/58.79 [16]~P2(x162)+~P2(x161)+P4(a6,x161,x162)+P3(x161,f8(x161,x162)) % 58.59/58.79 [19]~P2(x191)+~P2(x192)+P4(a9,x191,x192)+~P3(x192,f7(x191,x192)) % 58.59/58.79 %EqnAxiom % 58.59/58.79 % 58.59/58.79 %------------------------------------------- % 58.59/58.80 cnf(23,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P3(a1,x231)+~P3(a4,x231)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,9])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(24,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P3(a5,x241)+~P3(a1,x241)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,23])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(34,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P2(x341)+P4(a6,a1,x341)+P3(x341,f8(a1,x341))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,15,4])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(39,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P2(x391)+P4(a6,x391,a1)+P3(x391,f8(x391,a1))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,16,4])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(40,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P3(a2,f8(a2,a1))+P4(a6,a2,a1)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,39,4])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(41,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P3(a5,f8(a2,a1))+P4(a6,a2,a1)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[40,8])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(44,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P2(x441)+P4(a9,a1,x441)+~P3(x441,f7(a1,x441))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,19,4])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(60,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P3(a1,f7(a1,a1))+P4(a9,a1,a1)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,44])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(68,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P3(a10,f8(a1,a10))+P4(a6,a1,a10)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4,34])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(81,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a9,a1,a1)+P3(a1,f7(a1,a1))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,14])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(190,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a6,a2,a1)+P3(a4,f8(a2,a1))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,41])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(245,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P3(a1,x2451)+~P3(a2,x2451)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,24])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(246,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P3(a1,x2461)+~P3(a10,x2461)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[245,5])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(247,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a6,a1,a10)+~P3(a1,f8(a1,a10))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[246,68])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(248,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P2(a10)+~P2(a1)+P4(a6,a1,a10)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[247,16])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(373,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P2(a1)+~P3(a1,f7(a1,a1))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,60])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(374,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a9,a1,a1)+P2(a1)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[373,81])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(375,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P2(a1)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[374,11])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(376,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a6,a1,a10)+~P2(a10)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[375,248])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(381,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a6,a1,a10)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,376,4])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(382,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P2(a10)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[381,12])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(426,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a6,x4261,a1)+~P4(a9,x4262,x4261)+P3(a1,f8(x4261,a1))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[375,10,15])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(465,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a6,a2,a1)+~P3(a1,f8(a2,a1))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,190])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(466,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P3(a1,f8(a2,a1))+~P4(a9,a10,a2)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[465,20])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(467,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P4(a9,x4671,a2)+P4(a6,a2,a1)+~P4(a9,a10,a2)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[466,426])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(468,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P4(a6,a2,a1)+~P4(a9,a10,a2)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(factoring_inference,[],[467])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(469,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (~P4(a9,a10,a2)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[468,20])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(13526,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P2(a2)), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(13530,plain, % 58.59/58.80 (P3(a2,f7(a10,a2))), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,469,382,4,14,5])). % 58.59/58.80 cnf(13700,plain, % 58.59/58.80 ($false), % 58.59/58.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[13530,13526,469,382,19]), % 58.59/58.81 ['proof']). % 58.70/58.81 % SZS output end Proof % 58.70/58.81 % Total time :58.060000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------