%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB040+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 11.82s 2.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 104 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 113 ( 43 ~; 40 |; 21 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 1 sgn 27 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) )
& ic(X5)
& ic(X11) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_bool_complementof_class) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens) ).
fof(owl_prop_complementof_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X7)
=> ( ic(X7)
& ic(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_complementof_ext) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X13,X15)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X13,X4)
=> icext(X15,X4) )
& ic(X15)
& ic(X13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subclassof) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n1,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens) ).
fof(rdfs_subclassof_main,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X5,X6)
=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X5,X4)
=> icext(X6,X4) )
& ic(X6)
& ic(X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_subclassof_main) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) )
& ic(X5)
& ic(X11) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_bool_complementof_class]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X252,X253,X254] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X252,X253)
| icext(X252,X254)
| icext(X253,X254) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X252,X253)
| ~ icext(X253,X254)
| ~ icext(X252,X254) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X252,X253)
| ic(X253) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X252,X253)
| ic(X252) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X164,X165] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X164,X165)
| ic(X165) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X164,X165)
| ic(X164) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_complementof_ext])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X767,X768,X769,X770,X771] :
( ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X770,X771)
| ~ ic(X771)
| ~ ic(X770)
| ~ icext(X771,esk109_2(X770,X771)) )
& ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X770,X771)
| ~ ic(X771)
| ~ ic(X770)
| icext(X770,esk109_2(X770,X771)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X767,X768)
| icext(X768,X769)
| ~ icext(X767,X769) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X767,X768)
| ic(X768) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X767,X768)
| ic(X767) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subclassof])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X3,X1)
| icext(X3,X2)
| icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n1,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
| ic(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X64,X65,X66] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X64,X65)
| icext(X65,X66)
| ~ icext(X64,X66) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X64,X65)
| ic(X65) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X64,X65)
| ic(X64) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_subclassof_main])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ ic(X1)
| ~ ic(X2)
| ~ icext(X1,esk109_2(X2,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c1,X1)
| icext(uri_ex_n1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
ic(uri_ex_n1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X1,X2)
| icext(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ ic(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,uri_ex_n1)
| icext(uri_ex_c1,esk109_2(X1,uri_ex_n1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
ic(uri_ex_n2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_ex_c1,X1)
| icext(uri_ex_c2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
icext(uri_ex_c1,esk109_2(uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ ic(X2)
| ~ ic(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
| icext(X1,esk109_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_ex_n2,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
icext(uri_ex_c2,esk109_2(uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
icext(uri_ex_n2,esk109_2(uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_29]),c_0_19]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB040+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:38:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.82/2.06 % Version: 3.5.1
% 11.82/2.06 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.82/2.06 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1805363 completed with status 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 11.82/2.06 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.82/2.06 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.82/2.06 % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.82/2.06 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 11.82/2.06 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.82/2.06 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1805377 completed with status 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 11.82/2.06 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.82/2.06 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.82/2.06 % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.82/2.06 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 11.82/2.06 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.82/2.06 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 11.82/2.06 % Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 11.82/2.06
% 11.82/2.06 % Proof found!
% 11.82/2.06 % SZS status Theorem
% 11.82/2.06 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.82/2.06 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 11.82/2.06 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Initial clauses : 1270
% 11.82/2.06 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 11.82/2.06 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1159
% 11.82/2.06 % Processed clauses : 10573
% 11.82/2.06 % ...of these trivial : 1548
% 11.82/2.06 % ...subsumed : 3857
% 11.82/2.06 % ...remaining for further processing : 5168
% 11.82/2.06 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 11.82/2.06 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Backward-subsumed : 39
% 11.82/2.06 % Backward-rewritten : 32
% 11.82/2.06 % Generated clauses : 29152
% 11.82/2.06 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22461
% 11.82/2.06 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 42
% 11.82/2.06 % Paramodulations : 29134
% 11.82/2.06 % Factorizations : 2
% 11.82/2.06 % NegExts : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 11.82/2.06 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Total rewrite steps : 21706
% 11.82/2.06 % ...of those cached : 20285
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional check models : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 11.82/2.06 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 11.82/2.06 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 11.82/2.06 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 11.82/2.06 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 11.82/2.06 % Current number of processed clauses : 5081
% 11.82/2.06 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2279
% 11.82/2.06 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 11.82/2.06 % Non-unit-clauses : 2793
% 11.82/2.06 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13037
% 11.82/2.06 % ...number of literals in the above : 61946
% 11.82/2.06 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Current number of archived clauses : 72
% 11.82/2.06 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1621547
% 11.82/2.06 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 889917
% 11.82/2.06 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3917
% 11.82/2.06 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 506061
% 11.82/2.06 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1571
% 11.82/2.06 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 11.82/2.06 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Condensation successes : 0
% 11.82/2.06 % Termbank termtop insertions : 500328
% 11.82/2.06 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19088
% 11.82/2.06
% 11.82/2.06 % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.82/2.06 % User time : 1.413 s
% 11.82/2.06 % System time : 0.047 s
% 11.82/2.06 % Total time : 1.460 s
% 11.82/2.06 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 11.82/2.06
% 11.82/2.06 % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.82/2.06 % User time : 4.252 s
% 11.82/2.06 % System time : 0.158 s
% 11.82/2.06 % Total time : 4.410 s
% 11.82/2.06 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 11.82/2.06 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------