%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB043+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 114 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 25 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 139 ( 57 ~; 56 |; 19 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 5 sgn 30 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_chain_001,axiom,
! [X2,X12,X33] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X33) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X2,X12)
<=> ( ! [X36,X27] :
( iext(X33,X36,X27)
=> iext(X2,X36,X27) )
& ip(X33)
& ip(X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_chain_001) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_chain_subprop,axiom,
? [X42] :
( iext(uri_rdf_rest,X42,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X42,uri_ex_p1)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_ex_p,X42) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_chain_subprop) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X33,X4,X7)
=> iext(X34,X4,X7) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof) ).
fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X2,X1,X3)
=> ip(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_iext_property) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_chain_subprop,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_p),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_chain_subprop) ).
fof(owl_prop_propertychainaxiom_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X4,X7)
=> ( icext(uri_rdf_List,X7)
& ip(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_propertychainaxiom_ext) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X66,X67,X68,X69,X70] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X67,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X67,X68)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X66,X67)
| ~ ip(X68)
| ~ ip(X66)
| ~ iext(X66,esk5_3(X66,X67,X68),esk6_3(X66,X67,X68)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X67,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X67,X68)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X66,X67)
| ~ ip(X68)
| ~ ip(X66)
| iext(X68,esk5_3(X66,X67,X68),esk6_3(X66,X67,X68)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X67,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X67,X68)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X66,X67)
| iext(X66,X69,X70)
| ~ iext(X68,X69,X70) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X67,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X67,X68)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X66,X67)
| ip(X68) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X67,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X67,X68)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X66,X67)
| ip(X66) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_chain_001])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_p1)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_ex_p,esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_chain_subprop])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57] :
( ( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X56,X57)
| ~ ip(X57)
| ~ ip(X56)
| ~ iext(X57,esk2_2(X56,X57),esk3_2(X56,X57)) )
& ( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X56,X57)
| ~ ip(X57)
| ~ ip(X56)
| iext(X56,esk2_2(X56,X57),esk3_2(X56,X57)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| iext(X53,X54,X55)
| ~ iext(X52,X54,X55) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| ip(X53) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| ip(X52) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X114,X115,X116] :
( ip(X115)
| ~ iext(X115,X114,X116) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[simple_iext_property])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X5,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X5,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X4,X5)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| iext(X4,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_p1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_p),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_chain_subprop]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ip(X2)
| ~ iext(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1),esk3_2(X2,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,esk1_0)
| iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_ex_p,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X2,X3)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X60,X61] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X60,X61)
| icext(uri_rdf_List,X61) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X60,X61)
| ip(X60) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_propertychainaxiom_ext])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_p),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ iext(X2,esk2_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X1,X2)
| iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,esk1_0)
| ip(uri_ex_p1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,X2)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_p),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,esk2_2(X1,uri_ex_p),esk3_2(X1,uri_ex_p))
| ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ ip(X2)
| ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2)
| iext(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]),c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWB043+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:46:47 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % new_bool_1 with pid 2795446 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.60 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 125s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2795451 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.60 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 125s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.60
% 0.24/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.60 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.24/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 513
% 0.24/0.60 % Initial clauses : 95
% 0.24/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 95
% 0.24/0.60 % Processed clauses : 244
% 0.24/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 28
% 0.24/0.60 % ...subsumed : 50
% 0.24/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 166
% 0.24/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Generated clauses : 544
% 0.24/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 451
% 0.24/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 0.24/0.60 % Paramodulations : 544
% 0.24/0.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 237
% 0.24/0.60 % ...of those cached : 197
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 164
% 0.24/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 57
% 0.24/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 106
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 302
% 0.24/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 2386
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3324
% 0.24/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1132
% 0.24/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 60
% 0.24/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 98
% 0.24/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 20263
% 0.24/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3952
% 0.24/0.60
% 0.24/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.60 % User time : 0.040 s
% 0.24/0.60 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4384 pages
% 0.24/0.60
% 0.24/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.60 % User time : 0.092 s
% 0.24/0.60 % System time : 0.025 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Total time : 0.117 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.24/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------