↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWB047+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 17.48s 3.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 17.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  128 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  143 (  52   ~;  60   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   1 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
    <=> icext(X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).

fof(owl_inv,axiom,
    ! [X33,X34] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X33,X34)
    <=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
            ( iext(X33,X4,X7)
          <=> iext(X34,X7,X4) )
        & ip(X34)
        & ip(X33) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_inv) ).

fof(owl_prop_inverseof_ext,axiom,
    ! [X4,X7] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X4,X7)
     => ( ip(X7)
        & ip(X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_inverseof_ext) ).

fof(owl_char_functional,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X2)
    <=> ( ! [X4,X27,X28] :
            ( ( iext(X2,X4,X28)
              & iext(X2,X4,X27) )
           => X27 = X28 )
        & ip(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_functional) ).

fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term,axiom,
    ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p1,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty)
    & iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term) ).

fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
    <=> ( ! [X37,X38,X7] :
            ( ( iext(X2,X38,X7)
              & iext(X2,X37,X7) )
           => X37 = X38 )
        & ip(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).

fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term,conjecture,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X48,X49] :
      ( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
        | ~ icext(X49,X48) )
      & ( icext(X49,X48)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1014,X1015,X1016,X1017,X1018,X1019,X1020,X1021] :
      ( ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1020,X1021)
        | ~ ip(X1021)
        | ~ ip(X1020)
        | iext(X1021,esk160_2(X1020,X1021),esk159_2(X1020,X1021))
        | iext(X1020,esk159_2(X1020,X1021),esk160_2(X1020,X1021)) )
      & ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1020,X1021)
        | ~ ip(X1021)
        | ~ ip(X1020)
        | ~ iext(X1021,esk160_2(X1020,X1021),esk159_2(X1020,X1021))
        | ~ iext(X1020,esk159_2(X1020,X1021),esk160_2(X1020,X1021)) )
      & ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015)
        | iext(X1014,X1018,X1019)
        | ~ iext(X1015,X1019,X1018) )
      & ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015)
        | iext(X1015,X1017,X1016)
        | ~ iext(X1014,X1016,X1017) )
      & ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015)
        | ip(X1015) )
      & ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015)
        | ip(X1014) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_inv])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X194,X195] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X194,X195)
        | ip(X195) )
      & ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X194,X195)
        | ip(X194) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_inverseof_ext])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1030,X1031,X1032,X1033,X1034] :
      ( ( icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1034)
        | ~ ip(X1034)
        | esk164_1(X1034) != esk165_1(X1034) )
      & ( icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1034)
        | ~ ip(X1034)
        | iext(X1034,esk163_1(X1034),esk165_1(X1034)) )
      & ( icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1034)
        | ~ ip(X1034)
        | iext(X1034,esk163_1(X1034),esk164_1(X1034)) )
      & ( ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1030)
        | X1032 = X1033
        | ~ iext(X1030,X1031,X1033)
        | ~ iext(X1030,X1031,X1032) )
      & ( ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1030)
        | ip(X1030) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_functional])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
    | icext(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p1,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X4)
    | ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
    | iext(X4,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1038,X1039,X1040,X1041,X1042] :
      ( ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042)
        | ~ ip(X1042)
        | esk166_1(X1042) != esk167_1(X1042) )
      & ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042)
        | ~ ip(X1042)
        | iext(X1042,esk167_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042)) )
      & ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042)
        | ~ ip(X1042)
        | iext(X1042,esk166_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042)) )
      & ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038)
        | X1039 = X1040
        | ~ iext(X1038,X1040,X1041)
        | ~ iext(X1038,X1039,X1041) )
      & ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038)
        | ip(X1038) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X2)
    | ip(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1)
    | ~ iext(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X2,X1)
    | iext(uri_ex_p1,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ ip(X1)
    | icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
    | iext(X1,esk167_1(X1),esk168_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ip(uri_ex_p2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X3,X1)
    | ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X3,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( iext(uri_ex_p1,esk168_1(uri_ex_p2),esk167_1(uri_ex_p2))
    | icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ ip(X1)
    | icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
    | iext(X1,esk166_1(X1),esk168_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,esk168_1(uri_ex_p2),X1)
    | icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
    | X1 = esk167_1(uri_ex_p2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( iext(uri_ex_p1,esk168_1(uri_ex_p2),esk166_1(uri_ex_p2))
    | icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_25]),c_0_21])]) ).

fof(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ icext(X1,X2)
    | iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
    | esk167_1(uri_ex_p2) = esk166_1(uri_ex_p2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ip(X1)
    | esk166_1(X1) != esk167_1(X1)
    | icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    esk167_1(uri_ex_p2) = esk166_1(uri_ex_p2),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_35]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWB047+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.46  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:48:38 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.48/3.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 17.48/3.56  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 17.48/3.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1938841 completed with status 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 17.48/3.56  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 17.48/3.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 17.48/3.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 17.48/3.56  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 17.48/3.56  % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 17.48/3.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1938857 completed with status 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 17.48/3.56  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 17.48/3.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 17.48/3.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 17.48/3.56  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 17.48/3.56  % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 17.48/3.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 17.48/3.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.030 s
% 17.48/3.56  
% 17.48/3.56  % Proof found!
% 17.48/3.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 17.48/3.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 17.48/3.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 17.48/3.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Initial clauses                      : 1269
% 17.48/3.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 111
% 17.48/3.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1158
% 17.48/3.56  % Processed clauses                    : 11223
% 17.48/3.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 1543
% 17.48/3.56  % ...subsumed                          : 4172
% 17.48/3.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 5508
% 17.48/3.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 16
% 17.48/3.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 35
% 17.48/3.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 17.48/3.56  % Generated clauses                    : 28901
% 17.48/3.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22285
% 17.48/3.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 29
% 17.48/3.56  % Paramodulations                      : 28883
% 17.48/3.56  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 17.48/3.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 16
% 17.48/3.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 20919
% 17.48/3.56  % ...of those cached                   : 19559
% 17.48/3.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 17.48/3.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 17.48/3.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 17.48/3.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 17.48/3.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 17.48/3.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 5445
% 17.48/3.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2222
% 17.48/3.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 17.48/3.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 17.48/3.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3215
% 17.48/3.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12219
% 17.48/3.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 59383
% 17.48/3.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 48
% 17.48/3.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1776464
% 17.48/3.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 988730
% 17.48/3.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4217
% 17.48/3.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 724015
% 17.48/3.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1494
% 17.48/3.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 17.48/3.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 17.48/3.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 490263
% 17.48/3.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 19086
% 17.48/3.56  
% 17.48/3.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 17.48/3.56  % User time                : 2.632 s
% 17.48/3.56  % System time              : 0.057 s
% 17.48/3.56  % Total time               : 2.689 s
% 17.48/3.56  % Maximum resident set size: 7252 pages
% 17.48/3.56  
% 17.48/3.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 17.48/3.56  % User time                : 8.034 s
% 17.48/3.56  % System time              : 0.225 s
% 17.48/3.56  % Total time               : 8.260 s
% 17.48/3.56  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 17.48/3.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------