%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB049+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 84 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 90 ( 36 ~; 34 |; 14 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 7 sgn 33 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_prop_topobjectproperty_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_topObjectProperty,X4,X7)
<=> ( ir(X7)
& ir(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_topobjectproperty_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_ir) ).
fof(owl_char_reflexive,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X2)
<=> ( ! [X4] : iext(X2,X4,X4)
& ip(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_reflexive) ).
fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X2,X1,X3)
=> ip(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_iext_property) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_equivalentproperty,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X33,X4,X7)
<=> iext(X34,X4,X7) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_equivalentproperty) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_reflexive_ext,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_reflexive_ext) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_char_reflexive_ext,axiom,
iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_topObjectProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_char_reflexive_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X59,X60] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_topObjectProperty,X59,X60)
| ~ ir(X60)
| ~ ir(X59) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topObjectProperty,X59,X60)
| ir(X60) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topObjectProperty,X59,X60)
| ir(X59) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_topobjectproperty_ext])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X88] : ir(X88),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X43,X44,X45] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X45)
| ~ iext(X45,esk1_1(X45),esk1_1(X45))
| ~ ip(X45) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X43)
| iext(X43,X44,X44) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X43)
| ip(X43) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_reflexive])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X52,X53,X54] :
( ip(X53)
| ~ iext(X53,X52,X54) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[simple_iext_property])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X63,X64,X65,X66,X67,X68,X69,X70] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X69,X70)
| ~ ip(X70)
| ~ ip(X69)
| iext(X70,esk2_2(X69,X70),esk3_2(X69,X70))
| iext(X69,esk2_2(X69,X70),esk3_2(X69,X70)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X69,X70)
| ~ ip(X70)
| ~ ip(X69)
| ~ iext(X70,esk2_2(X69,X70),esk3_2(X69,X70))
| ~ iext(X69,esk2_2(X69,X70),esk3_2(X69,X70)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X63,X64)
| iext(X63,X67,X68)
| ~ iext(X64,X67,X68) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X63,X64)
| iext(X64,X65,X66)
| ~ iext(X63,X65,X66) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X63,X64)
| ip(X64) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X63,X64)
| ip(X63) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_equivalentproperty])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ ir(X2)
| ~ ir(X1)
| iext(uri_owl_topObjectProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_reflexive_ext]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk1_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X4,X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| iext(X4,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_topObjectProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_char_reflexive_ext]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_topObjectProperty,X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| ~ icext(X49,X48) )
& ( icext(X49,X48)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk1_1(X1))
| icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWB049+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:49:13 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % new_bool_1 with pid 2597714 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2597716 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.13/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 517
% 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses : 69
% 0.13/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 0.13/0.44 % Processed clauses : 109
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.13/0.44 % ...subsumed : 18
% 0.13/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 77
% 0.13/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Generated clauses : 99
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 49
% 0.13/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Paramodulations : 99
% 0.13/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 71
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of those cached : 51
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 76
% 0.13/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.13/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 0.13/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 33
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 260
% 0.13/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 235
% 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 19
% 0.13/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.13/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11083
% 0.13/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3545
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4384 pages
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.13/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------