%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB054+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 0.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 81 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 79 ( 33 ~; 30 |; 10 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 2 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_class_thing_ext,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X4)
<=> ir(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_class_thing_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_ir) ).
fof(owl_parts_ic_def,axiom,
! [X4] :
( ic(X4)
<=> iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,uri_rdfs_Class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_ic_def) ).
fof(owl_class_classowl_ext,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_Class,X4)
<=> ic(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_class_classowl_ext) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X13,X15)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X13,X4)
=> icext(X15,X4) )
& ic(X15)
& ic(X13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subclassof) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_class_thing_type,axiom,
ic(uri_owl_Thing),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_class_thing_type) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term,axiom,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X42] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X42)
| ~ ir(X42) )
& ( ir(X42)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Thing,X42) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_class_thing_ext])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X57] : ir(X57),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X78] :
( ( ic(X78)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X78,uri_rdfs_Class) )
& ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X78,uri_rdfs_Class)
| ~ ic(X78) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_ic_def])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X69] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_Class,X69)
| ~ ic(X69) )
& ( ic(X69)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X69) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_class_classowl_ext])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X51,X52,X53,X54,X55] :
( ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X54,X55)
| ~ ic(X55)
| ~ ic(X54)
| ~ icext(X55,esk1_2(X54,X55)) )
& ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X54,X55)
| ~ ic(X55)
| ~ ic(X54)
| icext(X54,esk1_2(X54,X55)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X51,X52)
| icext(X52,X53)
| ~ icext(X51,X53) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X51,X52)
| ic(X52) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X51,X52)
| ic(X51) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subclassof])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ ir(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_Thing,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ ic(X1)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdfs_Class) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1)
| ic(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X71,X72] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X71,X72)
| ~ icext(X72,X71) )
& ( icext(X72,X71)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X71,X72) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ ic(X1)
| ~ ic(X2)
| ~ icext(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Thing,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
ic(uri_owl_Thing),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[owl_class_thing_type]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdfs_Class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ ic(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,uri_owl_Thing) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdfs_Class)
| ic(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_Class)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdfs_Class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdfs_Class)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,uri_owl_Thing) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_rdfs_Class),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB054+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.48 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:44:20 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/0.67 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % new_bool_3 with pid 2061474 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.29/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.29/0.67 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.29/0.67 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.67 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2061478 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.29/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.29/0.67 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.29/0.67 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.67 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.29/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.67 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.29/0.67
% 0.29/0.67 % Proof found!
% 0.29/0.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/0.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/0.67 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.29/0.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 506
% 0.29/0.67 % Initial clauses : 81
% 0.29/0.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 81
% 0.29/0.67 % Processed clauses : 295
% 0.29/0.67 % ...of these trivial : 21
% 0.29/0.67 % ...subsumed : 70
% 0.29/0.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 204
% 0.29/0.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.29/0.67 % Generated clauses : 724
% 0.29/0.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 287
% 0.29/0.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Paramodulations : 724
% 0.29/0.67 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % NegExts : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Total rewrite steps : 506
% 0.29/0.67 % ...of those cached : 417
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 203
% 0.29/0.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 104
% 0.29/0.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.29/0.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 98
% 0.29/0.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73
% 0.29/0.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 227
% 0.29/0.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.29/0.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2107
% 0.29/0.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1863
% 0.29/0.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 70
% 0.29/0.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 82
% 0.29/0.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 63
% 0.29/0.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.29/0.67 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/0.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 16052
% 0.29/0.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3490
% 0.29/0.67
% 0.29/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.67 % User time : 0.028 s
% 0.29/0.67 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.29/0.67 % Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.29/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4436 pages
% 0.29/0.67
% 0.29/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.67 % User time : 0.063 s
% 0.29/0.67 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.29/0.67 % Total time : 0.079 s
% 0.29/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.29/0.67 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------