%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB057+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:35 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.58s 0.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 62 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 24 ~; 15 |; 13 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn 19 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) )
& ic(X5)
& ic(X11) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_bool_complementof_class) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext,axiom,
? [X42] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X42,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,X42) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X782,X783] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X782,X783)
| X782 = X783 )
& ( X782 != X783
| ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X782,X783) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) )
& ic(X5)
& ic(X11) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_bool_complementof_class]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk192_0,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,esk192_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X253,X254,X255] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| icext(X253,X255)
| icext(X254,X255) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| ~ icext(X254,X255)
| ~ icext(X253,X255) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| ic(X254) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X253,X254)
| ic(X253) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X49,X50] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X49,X50)
| ~ icext(X50,X49) )
& ( icext(X50,X49)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X49,X50) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,esk192_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_u = uri_ex_w,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk192_0,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk192_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ icext(esk192_0,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
icext(uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
icext(esk192_0,uri_ex_w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWB057+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:44:55 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.58/0.84 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.58/0.84 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.58/0.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % new_bool_1 with pid 397367 completed with status 9
% 1.58/0.84 % new_bool_3 with pid 397366 completed with status 9
% 1.58/0.84 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 397365 completed with status 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 1.58/0.84 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.58/0.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.58/0.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.58/0.84 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.58/0.84 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 1.58/0.84 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 397387 completed with status 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 1.58/0.84 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.58/0.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.58/0.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.58/0.84 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.58/0.84 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 1.58/0.84 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 1.58/0.84 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 1.58/0.84
% 1.58/0.84 % Proof found!
% 1.58/0.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.58/0.84 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.58/0.84 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 1.58/0.84 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Initial clauses : 1270
% 1.58/0.84 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 1.58/0.84 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1159
% 1.58/0.84 % Processed clauses : 2607
% 1.58/0.84 % ...of these trivial : 151
% 1.58/0.84 % ...subsumed : 243
% 1.58/0.84 % ...remaining for further processing : 2213
% 1.58/0.84 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 1.58/0.84 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Backward-subsumed : 28
% 1.58/0.84 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 1.58/0.84 % Generated clauses : 10007
% 1.58/0.84 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9363
% 1.58/0.84 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% 1.58/0.84 % Paramodulations : 9989
% 1.58/0.84 % Factorizations : 2
% 1.58/0.84 % NegExts : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 1.58/0.84 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Total rewrite steps : 7262
% 1.58/0.84 % ...of those cached : 6979
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.58/0.84 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.58/0.84 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.58/0.84 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.58/0.84 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.58/0.84 % Current number of processed clauses : 2167
% 1.58/0.84 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 739
% 1.58/0.84 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 1.58/0.84 % Non-unit-clauses : 1424
% 1.58/0.84 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7910
% 1.58/0.84 % ...number of literals in the above : 44106
% 1.58/0.84 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Current number of archived clauses : 31
% 1.58/0.84 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 794249
% 1.58/0.84 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137735
% 1.58/0.84 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 283
% 1.58/0.84 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 152579
% 1.58/0.84 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % BW rewrite match attempts : 57
% 1.58/0.84 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.58/0.84 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.58/0.84 % Termbank termtop insertions : 311453
% 1.58/0.84 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19095
% 1.58/0.84
% 1.58/0.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.58/0.84 % User time : 0.381 s
% 1.58/0.84 % System time : 0.027 s
% 1.58/0.84 % Total time : 0.408 s
% 1.58/0.84 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 1.58/0.84
% 1.58/0.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.58/0.84 % User time : 1.107 s
% 1.58/0.84 % System time : 0.134 s
% 1.58/0.84 % Total time : 1.242 s
% 1.58/0.84 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 1.58/0.84 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------