↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWB057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 2.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  21   ~;  15   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   5 sgn  19   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext,conjecture,
    iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext) ).

fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
    ! [X4,X7] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
    <=> X4 != X7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).

fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext,axiom,
    ? [X42] :
      ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,X42)
      & iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X42,uri_ex_c)
      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext) ).

fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
    ! [X11,X5] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
     => ( ic(X11)
        & ic(X5)
        & ! [X4] :
            ( icext(X11,X4)
          <=> ~ icext(X5,X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_bool_complementof_class) ).

fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
    <=> icext(X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9)
        | X8 != X9 )
      & ( X8 = X9
        | iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,esk192_0)
    & iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk192_0,uri_ex_c)
    & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14,X14] :
      ( ( ic(X12)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
      & ( ic(X13)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
      & ( ~ icext(X12,X14)
        | ~ icext(X13,X14)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
      & ( icext(X13,X14)
        | icext(X12,X14)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_bool_complementof_class])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
        | icext(X7,X6) )
      & ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
        | iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,esk192_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    uri_ex_u = uri_ex_w,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
    | ~ icext(X2,X3)
    | ~ icext(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk192_0,uri_ex_c),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( icext(X1,X2)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk192_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ icext(uri_ex_c,X1)
    | ~ icext(esk192_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    icext(esk192_0,uri_ex_w),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    icext(uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWB057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 09:48:30 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/2.46  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/2.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.087 s
% 0.27/2.46  
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof found!
% 0.27/2.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/2.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object total steps             : 24
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object clause steps            : 13
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.27/2.46  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.27/2.46  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/2.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.27/2.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.27/2.46  # Initial clauses                      : 1270
% 0.27/2.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 111
% 0.27/2.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1159
% 0.27/2.46  # Processed clauses                    : 2794
% 0.27/2.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 177
% 0.27/2.46  # ...subsumed                          : 518
% 0.27/2.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2099
% 0.27/2.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 48
% 0.27/2.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/2.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 49
% 0.27/2.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.27/2.46  # Generated clauses                    : 74485
% 0.27/2.46  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 73679
% 0.27/2.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 128
% 0.27/2.46  # Paramodulations                      : 74411
% 0.27/2.46  # Factorizations                       : 16
% 0.27/2.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 48
% 0.27/2.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2018
% 0.27/2.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 375
% 0.27/2.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/2.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 23
% 0.27/2.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1620
% 0.27/2.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 69372
% 0.27/2.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 587012
% 0.27/2.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/2.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 62
% 0.27/2.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 893181
% 0.27/2.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 166583
% 0.27/2.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 654
% 0.27/2.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47151
% 0.27/2.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/2.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 20
% 0.27/2.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.27/2.46  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.27/2.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/2.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1610386
% 0.27/2.46  
% 0.27/2.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/2.46  # User time                : 1.247 s
% 0.27/2.46  # System time              : 0.047 s
% 0.27/2.46  # Total time               : 1.294 s
% 0.27/2.46  # Maximum resident set size: 83388 pages
% 0.27/23.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.27/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------