%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SWB057+1 : TPTP v5.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Mar 4 00:42:44 EST 2011
% Result : Theorem 0.32s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 96 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 102 ( 40 ~; 30 |; 26 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn 30 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
=> ( ic(X1)
& ic(X2)
& ! [X3] :
( icext(X1,X3)
<=> ~ icext(X2,X3) ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpHPt9FL/sel_SWB057+1.p_1',owl_bool_complementof_class) ).
fof(8,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X4)
<=> X3 != X4 ),
file('/tmp/tmpHPt9FL/sel_SWB057+1.p_1',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(15,axiom,
! [X3,X2] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,X2)
<=> icext(X2,X3) ),
file('/tmp/tmpHPt9FL/sel_SWB057+1.p_1',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(17,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/tmp/tmpHPt9FL/sel_SWB057+1.p_1',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext) ).
fof(18,axiom,
? [X8] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,X8)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X8,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c) ),
file('/tmp/tmpHPt9FL/sel_SWB057+1.p_1',premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_different_ext) ).
fof(19,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[17]) ).
fof(20,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
=> ( ic(X1)
& ic(X2)
& ! [X3] :
( icext(X1,X3)
<=> ~ icext(X2,X3) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(21,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[19,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(22,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
| ( ic(X1)
& ic(X2)
& ! [X3] :
( ( ~ icext(X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X2,X3) )
& ( icext(X2,X3)
| icext(X1,X3) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(23,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X5)
| ( ic(X4)
& ic(X5)
& ! [X6] :
( ( ~ icext(X4,X6)
| ~ icext(X5,X6) )
& ( icext(X5,X6)
| icext(X4,X6) ) ) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
fof(24,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ( ~ icext(X4,X6)
| ~ icext(X5,X6) )
& ( icext(X5,X6)
| icext(X4,X6) )
& ic(X4)
& ic(X5) )
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X5) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
fof(25,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ icext(X4,X6)
| ~ icext(X5,X6)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X5) )
& ( icext(X5,X6)
| icext(X4,X6)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X5) )
& ( ic(X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X5) )
& ( ic(X5)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
cnf(29,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X3)
| ~ icext(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
fof(51,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X4)
| X3 != X4 )
& ( X3 = X4
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X4) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
fof(52,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X5,X6)
| X5 != X6 )
& ( X5 = X6
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
cnf(53,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[52]) ).
fof(75,plain,
! [X3,X2] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,X2)
| icext(X2,X3) )
& ( ~ icext(X2,X3)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
fof(76,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
| icext(X5,X4) )
& ( ~ icext(X5,X4)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[75]) ).
cnf(78,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[76]) ).
cnf(80,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
fof(81,plain,
? [X9] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,X9)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X9,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
fof(82,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,esk2_0)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk2_0,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[81]) ).
cnf(83,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[82]) ).
cnf(84,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk2_0,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[82]) ).
cnf(85,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[82]) ).
cnf(96,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_w = uri_ex_u,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[80,53,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(108,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_ex_c,X1)
| ~ icext(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,84,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(109,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[85,96,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(115,plain,
( ~ icext(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[108,78,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(117,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_c)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[115,78,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(118,plain,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[117,83,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(119,plain,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[118,109,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(120,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[119,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(121,plain,
$false,
120,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB057+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWB001+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpHPt9FL/sel_SWB057+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWB057+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB057+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB057+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------