%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB067+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 220.17s 72.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 220.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 117 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 134 ( 53 ~; 58 |; 17 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 65 ( 4 sgn 34 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_prop_inverseof_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X4,X7)
=> ( ip(X7)
& ip(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_inverseof_ext) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_inv_trans,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_inv_trans) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_equivalentproperty,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X33,X4,X7)
<=> iext(X34,X4,X7) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_equivalentproperty) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_inv_trans,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1)
& iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_inv_trans) ).
fof(owl_inv,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X33,X4,X7)
<=> iext(X34,X7,X4) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_inv) ).
fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X2,X1,X3)
=> ip(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_iext_property) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X81,X82] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X81,X82)
| ip(X82) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X81,X82)
| ip(X81) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_inverseof_ext])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_inv_trans]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X47,X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X53,X54)
| ~ ip(X54)
| ~ ip(X53)
| iext(X54,esk1_2(X53,X54),esk2_2(X53,X54))
| iext(X53,esk1_2(X53,X54),esk2_2(X53,X54)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X53,X54)
| ~ ip(X54)
| ~ ip(X53)
| ~ iext(X54,esk1_2(X53,X54),esk2_2(X53,X54))
| ~ iext(X53,esk1_2(X53,X54),esk2_2(X53,X54)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X47,X48)
| iext(X47,X51,X52)
| ~ iext(X48,X51,X52) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X47,X48)
| iext(X48,X49,X50)
| ~ iext(X47,X49,X50) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X47,X48)
| ip(X48) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X47,X48)
| ip(X47) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_equivalentproperty])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X2,X1)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_inv_trans]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X83,X84,X85,X86,X87,X88,X89,X90] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X89,X90)
| ~ ip(X90)
| ~ ip(X89)
| iext(X90,esk8_2(X89,X90),esk7_2(X89,X90))
| iext(X89,esk7_2(X89,X90),esk8_2(X89,X90)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X89,X90)
| ~ ip(X90)
| ~ ip(X89)
| ~ iext(X90,esk8_2(X89,X90),esk7_2(X89,X90))
| ~ iext(X89,esk7_2(X89,X90),esk8_2(X89,X90)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X83,X84)
| iext(X83,X87,X88)
| ~ iext(X84,X88,X87) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X83,X84)
| iext(X84,X86,X85)
| ~ iext(X83,X85,X86) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X83,X84)
| ip(X84) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X83,X84)
| ip(X83) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_inv])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ ip(X2)
| ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X1,X2)
| iext(X2,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))
| iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X2)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_inv_trans]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X42,X43,X44] :
( ip(X43)
| ~ iext(X43,X42,X44) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[simple_iext_property])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X4,X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| iext(X4,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X1,uri_ex_p1)
| iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,uri_ex_p1),esk2_2(X1,uri_ex_p1))
| iext(uri_ex_p1,esk1_2(X1,uri_ex_p1),esk2_2(X1,uri_ex_p1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X4)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| iext(X4,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ ip(X2)
| ~ ip(X1)
| ~ iext(X2,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))
| ~ iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))
| iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X2,X1)
| iext(uri_ex_p2,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p1,esk1_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),esk2_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1))
| iext(uri_ex_p3,esk1_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),esk2_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p3,X2,X1)
| iext(uri_ex_p2,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))
| ~ iext(X2,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))
| iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X2,X1)
| iext(uri_ex_p1,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X2,X1)
| iext(uri_ex_p3,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p2,esk2_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),esk1_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1)),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,uri_ex_p1),esk2_2(X1,uri_ex_p1))
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,esk2_2(X1,uri_ex_p1),esk1_2(X1,uri_ex_p1))
| iext(uri_owl_equivalentProperty,X1,uri_ex_p1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p3,esk1_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1),esk2_2(uri_ex_p3,uri_ex_p1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_32]),c_0_34])]),c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWB067+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:45:04 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 220.17/72.74 % Version: 3.5.1
% 220.17/72.74 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 220.17/72.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % new_bool_1 with pid 3560534 completed with status 9
% 220.17/72.74 % new_bool_3 with pid 3560533 completed with status 9
% 220.17/72.74 % sh5l with pid 3560535 completed with status 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Result found by sh5l
% 220.17/72.74 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 220.17/72.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 220.17/72.74 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 220.17/72.74 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 220.17/72.74 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3560546 completed with status 8
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting sh5l with 31s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % sh5l with pid 3560600 completed with status 8
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 3561022 completed with status 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 220.17/72.74 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 220.17/72.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 220.17/72.74 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 220.17/72.74 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 220.17/72.74 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3560546 completed with status 8
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting sh5l with 31s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % sh5l with pid 3560600 completed with status 8
% 220.17/72.74 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 220.17/72.74 % Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 220.17/72.74
% 220.17/72.74 % Proof found!
% 220.17/72.74 % SZS status Theorem
% 220.17/72.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 220.17/72.74 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 220.17/72.74 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 330
% 220.17/72.74 % Initial clauses : 627
% 220.17/72.74 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Initial clauses in saturation : 627
% 220.17/72.74 % Processed clauses : 5956
% 220.17/72.74 % ...of these trivial : 237
% 220.17/72.74 % ...subsumed : 1339
% 220.17/72.74 % ...remaining for further processing : 4380
% 220.17/72.74 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 220.17/72.74 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Backward-subsumed : 29
% 220.17/72.74 % Backward-rewritten : 56
% 220.17/72.74 % Generated clauses : 239259
% 220.17/72.74 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 235715
% 220.17/72.74 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 52
% 220.17/72.74 % Paramodulations : 239251
% 220.17/72.74 % Factorizations : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % NegExts : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Equation resolutions : 8
% 220.17/72.74 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Total rewrite steps : 29928
% 220.17/72.74 % ...of those cached : 29341
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional check models : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 220.17/72.74 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 220.17/72.74 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 220.17/72.74 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 220.17/72.74 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 220.17/72.74 % Current number of processed clauses : 4287
% 220.17/72.74 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 453
% 220.17/72.74 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 220.17/72.74 % Non-unit-clauses : 3833
% 220.17/72.74 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 229903
% 220.17/72.74 % ...number of literals in the above : 3093927
% 220.17/72.74 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Current number of archived clauses : 85
% 220.17/72.74 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4968384
% 220.17/72.74 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 290776
% 220.17/72.74 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1419
% 220.17/72.74 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56491
% 220.17/72.74 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % BW rewrite match attempts : 215
% 220.17/72.74 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 220.17/72.74 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Condensation successes : 0
% 220.17/72.74 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10242515
% 220.17/72.74 % Search garbage collected termcells : 12053
% 220.17/72.74
% 220.17/72.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 220.17/72.74 % User time : 70.185 s
% 220.17/72.74 % System time : 1.667 s
% 220.17/72.74 % Total time : 71.852 s
% 220.17/72.74 % Maximum resident set size: 5920 pages
% 220.17/72.74
% 220.17/72.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 220.17/72.74 % User time : 74.206 s
% 220.17/72.74 % System time : 1.795 s
% 220.17/72.74 % Total time : 76.001 s
% 220.17/72.74 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 220.17/72.74 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------