%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB073+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 27 ~; 20 |; 7 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 2 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term) ).
fof(owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] : ~ iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X4,X7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_ext) ).
fof(owl_parts_iodp_cond_set,axiom,
! [X4] :
( iodp(X4)
=> ip(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_iodp_cond_set) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X33,X4,X7)
=> iext(X34,X4,X7) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof) ).
fof(owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_type,axiom,
iodp(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_type) ).
fof(owl_parts_iodp_def,axiom,
! [X4] :
( iodp(X4)
<=> iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_iodp_def) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term,axiom,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X4,X7] : ~ iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X4,X7),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_ext]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X70] :
( ip(X70)
| ~ iodp(X70) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_iodp_cond_set])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X42,X43] : ~ iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X42,X43),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57] :
( ( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X56,X57)
| ~ ip(X57)
| ~ ip(X56)
| ~ iext(X57,esk1_2(X56,X57),esk2_2(X56,X57)) )
& ( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X56,X57)
| ~ ip(X57)
| ~ ip(X56)
| iext(X56,esk1_2(X56,X57),esk2_2(X56,X57)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| iext(X53,X54,X55)
| ~ iext(X52,X54,X55) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| ip(X53) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| ip(X52) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ iodp(X1)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iodp(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_type]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X60] :
( ( iodp(X60)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X60,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty) )
& ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X60,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
| ~ iodp(X60) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_iodp_def])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ ip(X2)
| ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2)
| iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
ip(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
| iodp(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ ip(uri_ex_p),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB073+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:44:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 1374506 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1374512 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.13/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 513
% 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses : 72
% 0.13/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 0.13/0.44 % Processed clauses : 169
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 15
% 0.13/0.44 % ...subsumed : 19
% 0.13/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 135
% 0.13/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Generated clauses : 155
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 101
% 0.13/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Paramodulations : 155
% 0.13/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 97
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of those cached : 79
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 83
% 0.13/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.13/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 49
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 55
% 0.13/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 173
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 52
% 0.13/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 294
% 0.13/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 230
% 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.13/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.13/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 12116
% 0.13/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3502
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4436 pages
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.13/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------