%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.10s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 15 ~; 11 |; 5 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 3 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).
fof(owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X4,X7)
<=> ( lv(X7)
& ir(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_ir) ).
fof(owl_parts_lv_def,axiom,
! [X4] :
( lv(X4)
<=> iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,uri_rdfs_Literal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_lv_def) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Thing)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X42,X43] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43)
| ~ lv(X43)
| ~ ir(X42) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43)
| lv(X43) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43)
| ir(X42) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X58] : ir(X58),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ lv(X2)
| ~ ir(X1)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X52] :
( ( lv(X52)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X52,uri_rdfs_Literal) )
& ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X52,uri_rdfs_Literal)
| ~ lv(X52) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_lv_def])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ lv(X2)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdfs_Literal)
| lv(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,uri_rdfs_Literal)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:48:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % new_bool_1 with pid 962594 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.10/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.47 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 962597 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.47 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.10/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.47
% 0.10/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.47 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.10/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 492
% 0.10/0.47 % Initial clauses : 96
% 0.10/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 96
% 0.10/0.47 % Processed clauses : 297
% 0.10/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 17
% 0.10/0.47 % ...subsumed : 55
% 0.10/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 225
% 0.10/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.10/0.47 % Generated clauses : 544
% 0.10/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 349
% 0.10/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Paramodulations : 544
% 0.10/0.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 234
% 0.10/0.47 % ...of those cached : 193
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 223
% 0.10/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 81
% 0.10/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.10/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 141
% 0.10/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 147
% 0.10/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 350
% 0.10/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.10/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1745
% 0.10/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1587
% 0.10/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 55
% 0.10/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 0.10/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 66
% 0.10/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.10/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 15504
% 0.10/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3496
% 0.10/0.47
% 0.10/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.47 % User time : 0.018 s
% 0.10/0.47 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.47 % Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.10/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4436 pages
% 0.10/0.47
% 0.10/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.47 % User time : 0.045 s
% 0.10/0.47 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.10/0.47 % Total time : 0.058 s
% 0.10/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.10/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------