↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWB074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:04:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.36s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  26   ~;  21   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  31   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ir(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_ir) ).

fof(f25,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1)
    <=> icext(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).

fof(f56,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( lv(X0)
    <=> icext(uri_rdfs_Literal,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_lv_def) ).

fof(f266,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1)
    <=> ( lv(X1)
        & ir(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext) ).

fof(f559,conjecture,
    iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).

fof(f560,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f559]) ).

fof(f561,axiom,
    ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Thing)
    & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).

fof(f562,plain,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
    inference(flattening,[],[f560]) ).

fof(f643,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1)
        | ( lv(X1)
          & ir(X0) ) )
      & ( ~ lv(X1)
        | ~ ir(X0)
        | iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f266]) ).

fof(f644,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1)
        | ( lv(X1)
          & ir(X0) ) )
      & ( ~ lv(X1)
        | ~ ir(X0)
        | iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f643]) ).

fof(f648,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1)
        | icext(X1,X0) )
      & ( ~ icext(X1,X0)
        | iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f652,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ lv(X0)
        | icext(uri_rdfs_Literal,X0) )
      & ( ~ icext(uri_rdfs_Literal,X0)
        | lv(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f674,plain,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f562]) ).

fof(f678,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ lv(X1)
      | ~ ir(X0)
      | iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f644]) ).

fof(f680,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).

fof(f692,plain,
    ! [X0] : ir(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f699,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1)
      | icext(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f648]) ).

fof(f713,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ icext(uri_rdfs_Literal,X0)
      | lv(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f652]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f674]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1)
      | ~ lv(X1)
      | ~ ir(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f678]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f680]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ir(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f692]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( icext(X1,X0)
      | ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f699]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( lv(X0)
      | ~ icext(uri_rdfs_Literal,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f713]) ).

tcf(c_347,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X0,X1)
      | ~ lv(X1) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_67,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_348,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X0)
      | ~ lv(X0) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_347]) ).

tcf(c_2120,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X0)
      | ~ lv(X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_348]) ).

tcf(c_5154,plain,
    icext(uri_rdfs_Literal,uri_ex_y),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_75]) ).

tcf(c_5210,plain,
    lv(uri_ex_y),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5154,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_5768,plain,
    ~ lv(uri_ex_y),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2120,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_5771,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5768,c_5210]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWB074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 15:45:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 4.36/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.36/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.36/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.36/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % 
% 4.36/1.28  % clauses                               138
% 4.36/1.28  % conjectures                           1
% 4.36/1.28  % EPR                                   132
% 4.36/1.28  % Horn                                  135
% 4.36/1.28  % unary                                 40
% 4.36/1.28  % binary                                87
% 4.36/1.28  % lits                                  253
% 4.36/1.28  % lits eq                               0
% 4.36/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.36/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.36/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.36/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 4.36/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ 
% 4.36/1.28  % Current options:
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 4.36/1.28  % 
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.36/1.28  
% 4.36/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------