%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB075+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 105 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 112 ( 46 ~; 46 |; 12 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 6 sgn 32 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X4,X7)
<=> ( lv(X7)
& ir(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_ir) ).
fof(owl_parts_iodp_cond_inst,axiom,
! [X4] :
( iodp(X4)
=> ! [X7,X11] :
( iext(X4,X7,X11)
=> ( lv(X11)
& ir(X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_iodp_cond_inst) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X33,X4,X7)
=> iext(X34,X4,X7) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof) ).
fof(owl_parts_iodp_cond_set,axiom,
! [X4] :
( iodp(X4)
=> ip(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_iodp_cond_set) ).
fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X2,X1,X3)
=> ip(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_iext_property) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_term,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_topDataProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_term) ).
fof(owl_prop_topdataproperty_type,axiom,
iodp(uri_owl_topDataProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_topdataproperty_type) ).
fof(owl_parts_iodp_def,axiom,
! [X4] :
( iodp(X4)
<=> iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_iodp_def) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_term,axiom,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_term) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X42,X43] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43)
| ~ lv(X43)
| ~ ir(X42) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43)
| lv(X43) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43)
| ir(X42) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X64] : ir(X64),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X73,X74,X75] :
( ( ~ iodp(X73)
| ~ iext(X73,X74,X75)
| lv(X75) )
& ( ~ iodp(X73)
| ~ iext(X73,X74,X75)
| ir(X74) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_iodp_cond_inst])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57] :
( ( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X56,X57)
| ~ ip(X57)
| ~ ip(X56)
| ~ iext(X57,esk1_2(X56,X57),esk2_2(X56,X57)) )
& ( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X56,X57)
| ~ ip(X57)
| ~ ip(X56)
| iext(X56,esk1_2(X56,X57),esk2_2(X56,X57)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| iext(X53,X54,X55)
| ~ iext(X52,X54,X55) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| ip(X53) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X52,X53)
| ip(X52) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X76] :
( ip(X76)
| ~ iodp(X76) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_iodp_cond_set])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X97,X98,X99] :
( ip(X98)
| ~ iext(X98,X97,X99) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[simple_iext_property])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ lv(X2)
| ~ ir(X1)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ iodp(X2)
| ~ iext(X2,X3,X1)
| lv(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ ip(X2)
| ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2)
| iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ iodp(X1)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_topDataProperty),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_term]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ip(X2)
| ~ iext(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1),esk2_2(X2,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ lv(X2)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ ip(X2)
| ~ iodp(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2)
| lv(esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
iodp(uri_owl_topDataProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_topdataproperty_type]) ).
fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_topDataProperty),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ iext(X2,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ip(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ ip(X3)
| ~ iodp(X2)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X2,X3)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,esk2_2(X2,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
ip(uri_owl_topDataProperty),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_26]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X77] :
( ( iodp(X77)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X77,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty) )
& ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X77,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
| ~ iodp(X77) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_iodp_def])])]) ).
fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_topDataProperty),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ iodp(X1)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,uri_owl_topDataProperty) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
| iodp(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_topDataProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,uri_owl_topDataProperty) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_term]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB075+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.42 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:47:15 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.42 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % new_bool_1 with pid 3779337 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.25/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.63 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3779340 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.63 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.25/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.63
% 0.25/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.63 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.25/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 512
% 0.25/0.63 % Initial clauses : 75
% 0.25/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 75
% 0.25/0.63 % Processed clauses : 458
% 0.25/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 17
% 0.25/0.63 % ...subsumed : 170
% 0.25/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 271
% 0.25/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.25/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.25/0.63 % Generated clauses : 622
% 0.25/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 458
% 0.25/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.25/0.63 % Paramodulations : 622
% 0.25/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 289
% 0.25/0.63 % ...of those cached : 257
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 267
% 0.25/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 48
% 0.25/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 218
% 0.25/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 74
% 0.25/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 348
% 0.25/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.25/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5746
% 0.25/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3996
% 0.25/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 176
% 0.25/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75
% 0.25/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 0.25/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.25/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 18140
% 0.25/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3525
% 0.25/0.63
% 0.25/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.63 % User time : 0.043 s
% 0.25/0.63 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.25/0.63 % Total time : 0.053 s
% 0.25/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4436 pages
% 0.25/0.63
% 0.25/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.63 % User time : 0.103 s
% 0.25/0.63 % System time : 0.024 s
% 0.25/0.63 % Total time : 0.127 s
% 0.25/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.25/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------