%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB087+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.90s 6.25s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 19 ~; 15 |; 5 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 1 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_restrict_hasself,axiom,
! [X11,X2,X31] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X11,X2)
& iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X11,X31) )
=> ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> iext(X2,X4,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_restrict_hasself) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj,axiom,
( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_w)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,uri_ex_z,literal_typed(dat_str_true,uri_xsd_boolean)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X531,X532,X533,X534] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X531,X532)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X531,X533)
| icext(X531,X534)
| ~ iext(X532,X534,X534) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X531,X532)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X531,X533)
| iext(X532,X534,X534)
| ~ icext(X531,X534) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_restrict_hasself])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X2)
| icext(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,uri_ex_z,literal_typed(dat_str_true,uri_xsd_boolean)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ iext(X2,X1,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X2)
| icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| ~ icext(X49,X48) )
& ( icext(X49,X48)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X1)
| icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_w),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_hasself_inst_subj]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
icext(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB087+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.38 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:49:12 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.90/6.25 % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.90/6.25 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.90/6.25 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 963364 completed with status 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 5.90/6.25 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.90/6.25 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.90/6.25 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.90/6.25 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 5.90/6.25 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 5.90/6.25 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 963389 completed with status 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 5.90/6.25 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.90/6.25 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.90/6.25 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.90/6.25 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 5.90/6.25 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 5.90/6.25 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 5.90/6.25 % Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 5.90/6.25
% 5.90/6.25 % Proof found!
% 5.90/6.25 % SZS status Theorem
% 5.90/6.25 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.90/6.25 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 5.90/6.25 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Initial clauses : 1270
% 5.90/6.25 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 5.90/6.25 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1159
% 5.90/6.25 % Processed clauses : 9282
% 5.90/6.25 % ...of these trivial : 1521
% 5.90/6.25 % ...subsumed : 3038
% 5.90/6.25 % ...remaining for further processing : 4723
% 5.90/6.25 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 5.90/6.25 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Backward-subsumed : 28
% 5.90/6.25 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Generated clauses : 25062
% 5.90/6.25 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19128
% 5.90/6.25 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 5.90/6.25 % Paramodulations : 25044
% 5.90/6.25 % Factorizations : 2
% 5.90/6.25 % NegExts : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 5.90/6.25 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Total rewrite steps : 19226
% 5.90/6.25 % ...of those cached : 17862
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional check models : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.90/6.25 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.90/6.25 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.90/6.25 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.90/6.25 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.90/6.25 % Current number of processed clauses : 4679
% 5.90/6.25 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2237
% 5.90/6.25 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 5.90/6.25 % Non-unit-clauses : 2434
% 5.90/6.25 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11001
% 5.90/6.25 % ...number of literals in the above : 55190
% 5.90/6.25 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Current number of archived clauses : 29
% 5.90/6.25 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1380028
% 5.90/6.25 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 688749
% 5.90/6.25 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3079
% 5.90/6.25 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 442920
% 5.90/6.25 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1483
% 5.90/6.25 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Condensation successes : 0
% 5.90/6.25 % Termbank termtop insertions : 451962
% 5.90/6.25 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19088
% 5.90/6.25
% 5.90/6.25 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.90/6.25 % User time : 0.744 s
% 5.90/6.25 % System time : 0.039 s
% 5.90/6.25 % Total time : 0.783 s
% 5.90/6.25 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 5.90/6.25
% 5.90/6.25 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.90/6.25 % User time : 2.123 s
% 5.90/6.25 % System time : 0.106 s
% 5.90/6.25 % Total time : 2.228 s
% 5.90/6.25 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 5.90/6.25 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------