%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB097+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 161.96s 28.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 161.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 65 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 73 ( 32 ~; 28 |; 10 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 11 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_restrict_minqcr_object_001,axiom,
! [X11,X2,X5] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_onClass,X11,X5)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X11,X2)
& iext(uri_owl_minQualifiedCardinality,X11,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger)) )
=> ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ? [X7] :
( icext(X5,X7)
& iext(X2,X4,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_restrict_minqcr_object_001) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one,axiom,
( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_onClass,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_minQualifiedCardinality,uri_ex_z,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X717,X718,X719,X720,X722,X723] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X717,X719)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X717,X718)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_minQualifiedCardinality,X717,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| icext(X717,X722)
| ~ icext(X719,X723)
| ~ iext(X718,X722,X723) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X717,X719)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X717,X718)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_minQualifiedCardinality,X717,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X717,X720)
| icext(X719,esk98_4(X717,X718,X719,X720)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X717,X719)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X717,X718)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_minQualifiedCardinality,X717,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X717,X720)
| iext(X718,X720,esk98_4(X717,X718,X719,X720)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_restrict_minqcr_object_001])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| ~ icext(X49,X48) )
& ( icext(X49,X48)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X5,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X5,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_minQualifiedCardinality,X5,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X4,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| icext(X5,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onClass,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_owl_minQualifiedCardinality,uri_ex_z,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ iext(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X3)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c,X2)
| icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
icext(uri_ex_c,uri_ex_x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ iext(X2,X1,uri_ex_x)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X2)
| icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,uri_ex_x)
| icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_x),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_minqcr_inst_subj_one]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
icext(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB097+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.37 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:43:03 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 161.96/28.92 % Version: 3.5.1
% 161.96/28.92 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 161.96/28.92 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1809713 completed with status 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 161.96/28.92 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 161.96/28.92 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 161.96/28.92 % No SInE strategy applied
% 161.96/28.92 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 161.96/28.92 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 161.96/28.92 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1809734 completed with status 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 161.96/28.92 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 161.96/28.92 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 161.96/28.92 % No SInE strategy applied
% 161.96/28.92 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 161.96/28.92 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 161.96/28.92 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 161.96/28.92 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 161.96/28.92
% 161.96/28.92 % Proof found!
% 161.96/28.92 % SZS status Theorem
% 161.96/28.92 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 161.96/28.92 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 161.96/28.92 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Initial clauses : 1272
% 161.96/28.92 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 161.96/28.92 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1161
% 161.96/28.92 % Processed clauses : 43717
% 161.96/28.92 % ...of these trivial : 1592
% 161.96/28.92 % ...subsumed : 21918
% 161.96/28.92 % ...remaining for further processing : 20207
% 161.96/28.92 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 161.96/28.92 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Backward-subsumed : 64
% 161.96/28.92 % Backward-rewritten : 95
% 161.96/28.92 % Generated clauses : 404282
% 161.96/28.92 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 378333
% 161.96/28.92 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 93
% 161.96/28.92 % Paramodulations : 404264
% 161.96/28.92 % Factorizations : 2
% 161.96/28.92 % NegExts : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 161.96/28.92 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Total rewrite steps : 252275
% 161.96/28.92 % ...of those cached : 250785
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional check models : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 161.96/28.92 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 161.96/28.92 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 161.96/28.92 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 161.96/28.92 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 161.96/28.92 % Current number of processed clauses : 20032
% 161.96/28.92 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2384
% 161.96/28.92 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 161.96/28.92 % Non-unit-clauses : 17639
% 161.96/28.92 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 309213
% 161.96/28.92 % ...number of literals in the above : 1681997
% 161.96/28.92 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Current number of archived clauses : 160
% 161.96/28.92 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 73685036
% 161.96/28.92 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34074547
% 161.96/28.92 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 22036
% 161.96/28.92 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 632624
% 161.96/28.92 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1627
% 161.96/28.92 % BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 161.96/28.92 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Condensation successes : 0
% 161.96/28.92 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8707465
% 161.96/28.92 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19058
% 161.96/28.92
% 161.96/28.92 % -------------------------------------------------
% 161.96/28.92 % User time : 22.670 s
% 161.96/28.92 % System time : 0.315 s
% 161.96/28.92 % Total time : 22.985 s
% 161.96/28.92 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 161.96/28.92
% 161.96/28.92 % -------------------------------------------------
% 161.96/28.92 % User time : 67.320 s
% 161.96/28.92 % System time : 1.160 s
% 161.96/28.92 % Total time : 68.479 s
% 161.96/28.92 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 161.96/28.92 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------