↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:42:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.36s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  209 (  54 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   54 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  263 (  92   ~;  89   |;  49   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  31  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   31 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0 sgn  41   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                      & ( ! [X8] :
                            ( ssItem(X8)
                           => ! [X9] :
                                ( ssList(X9)
                               => ! [X10] :
                                    ( ssList(X10)
                                   => ( ? [X11] :
                                          ( geq(X11,X8)
                                          & memberP(X4,X11)
                                          & X8 != X11
                                          & ssItem(X11) )
                                      | app(X9,X10) != X3
                                      | app(app(X9,cons(X8,nil)),X10) != X4 ) ) ) )
                        | ? [X5] :
                            ( ? [X6] :
                                ( ? [X7] :
                                    ( neq(X6,nil)
                                    & app(X5,X7) = X1
                                    & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
                                    & ssList(X7) )
                                & ssList(X6) )
                            & ssList(X5) )
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).

fof(ax21,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax21) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(ax16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax16) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                        & ( ! [X8] :
                              ( ssItem(X8)
                             => ! [X9] :
                                  ( ssList(X9)
                                 => ! [X10] :
                                      ( ssList(X10)
                                     => ( ? [X11] :
                                            ( geq(X11,X8)
                                            & memberP(X4,X11)
                                            & X8 != X11
                                            & ssItem(X11) )
                                        | app(X9,X10) != X3
                                        | app(app(X9,cons(X8,nil)),X10) != X4 ) ) ) )
                          | ? [X5] :
                              ( ? [X6] :
                                  ( ? [X7] :
                                      ( neq(X6,nil)
                                      & app(X5,X7) = X1
                                      & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
                                      & ssList(X7) )
                                  & ssList(X6) )
                              & ssList(X5) )
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                        & ( ! [X8] :
                              ( ssItem(X8)
                             => ! [X9] :
                                  ( ssList(X9)
                                 => ! [X10] :
                                      ( ssList(X10)
                                     => ( ? [X11] :
                                            ( geq(X11,X8)
                                            & memberP(X4,X11)
                                            & X8 != X11
                                            & ssItem(X11) )
                                        | app(X9,X10) != X3
                                        | app(app(X9,cons(X8,nil)),X10) != X4 ) ) ) )
                          | ? [X5] :
                              ( ? [X6] :
                                  ( ? [X7] :
                                      ( neq(X6,nil)
                                      & app(X5,X7) = X1
                                      & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
                                      & ssList(X7) )
                                  & ssList(X6) )
                              & ssList(X5) )
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X16,X17,X18,X22] :
      ( ( ~ geq(X22,esk5_0)
        | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X22)
        | esk5_0 = X22
        | ~ ssItem(X22)
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ geq(X22,esk5_0)
        | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X22)
        | esk5_0 = X22
        | ~ ssItem(X22)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( app(esk6_0,esk7_0) = esk3_0
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( app(esk6_0,esk7_0) = esk3_0
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( app(app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)),esk7_0) = esk4_0
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( app(app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)),esk7_0) = esk4_0
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( ssList(esk7_0)
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( ssList(esk7_0)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( ssList(esk6_0)
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( ssList(esk6_0)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( ssItem(esk5_0)
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( ssItem(esk5_0)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ neq(X17,nil)
        | app(X16,X18) != esk1_0
        | app(app(X16,X17),X18) != esk2_0
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | ~ ssList(X17)
        | ~ ssList(X16)
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ neq(X17,nil)
        | app(X16,X18) != esk1_0
        | app(app(X16,X17),X18) != esk2_0
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | ~ ssList(X17)
        | ~ ssList(X16)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
        | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
      & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk1_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk2_0,nil),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
    | app(X1,X3) != esk1_0
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk2_0
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk4_0,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | app(app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)),esk7_0) = esk4_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | app(esk6_0,esk7_0) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ssList(esk7_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ssList(esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(X1,X3) != esk1_0
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk4_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)),esk7_0) = esk4_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk6_0,esk7_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk7_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk6_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ( ~ ssList(X25)
        | ~ ssList(X26)
        | neq(X25,X26)
        | X25 = X26 )
      & ( ~ ssList(X25)
        | ~ ssList(X26)
        | X25 != X26
        | ~ neq(X25,X26) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(cons(esk5_0,nil),nil)
    | ~ ssList(cons(esk5_0,nil)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X75,X76] :
      ( ssList(cons(X76,X75))
      | ~ ssItem(X76)
      | ~ ssList(X75) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ssItem(esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X30,X31] :
      ( nil != cons(X31,X30)
      | ~ ssItem(X31)
      | ~ ssList(X30) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(esk5_0,nil))
    | cons(esk5_0,nil) = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk5_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( nil != cons(X2,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    cons(esk5_0,nil) = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_28]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_28]),c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:48:55 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.48  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.36/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % new_bool_1 with pid 402336 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.36/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.36/0.48  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.48  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.48  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % SubtermCWHack with pid 402338 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.36/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.36/0.48  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.48  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.48  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.48  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.36/0.48  
% 0.36/0.48  % Proof found!
% 0.36/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.48  % Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.36/0.48  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 60
% 0.36/0.48  % Initial clauses                      : 76
% 0.36/0.48  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 76
% 0.36/0.48  % Processed clauses                    : 212
% 0.36/0.48  % ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.36/0.48  % ...subsumed                          : 77
% 0.36/0.48  % ...remaining for further processing  : 126
% 0.36/0.48  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 16
% 0.36/0.48  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Backward-subsumed                    : 7
% 0.36/0.48  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.36/0.48  % Generated clauses                    : 493
% 0.36/0.48  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 385
% 0.36/0.48  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 0.36/0.48  % Paramodulations                      : 474
% 0.36/0.48  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Equation resolutions                 : 20
% 0.36/0.48  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Total rewrite steps                  : 490
% 0.36/0.48  % ...of those cached                   : 477
% 0.36/0.48  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.36/0.48  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.36/0.48  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.36/0.48  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.36/0.48  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.36/0.48  % Current number of processed clauses  : 107
% 0.36/0.48  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.36/0.48  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.48  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.36/0.48  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 90
% 0.36/0.48  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 242
% 0.36/0.48  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1125
% 0.36/0.48  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.36/0.48  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1124
% 0.36/0.48  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 617
% 0.36/0.48  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 89
% 0.36/0.48  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.36/0.48  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.36/0.48  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.36/0.48  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.36/0.48  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 14380
% 0.36/0.48  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2030
% 0.36/0.48  
% 0.36/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.48  % User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.36/0.48  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.36/0.48  % Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.36/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 3764 pages
% 0.36/0.48  
% 0.36/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.48  % User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.36/0.48  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.36/0.48  % Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.36/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.36/0.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------