↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWC009+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:17:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.35s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   23 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  117 (  39   ~;  34   |;  33   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   28 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   0 sgn  19   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                        & ? [X6] :
                            ( ssList(X6)
                            & ? [X7] :
                                ( ssList(X7)
                                & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
                                & app(X5,X7) = X1 ) ) )
                    | ! [X8] :
                        ( ssList(X8)
                       => ( app(X3,X8) != X4
                          | ~ strictorderedP(X3)
                          | ? [X9] :
                              ( ssItem(X9)
                              & ? [X10] :
                                  ( ssList(X10)
                                  & app(cons(X9,nil),X10) = X8
                                  & ? [X11] :
                                      ( ssItem(X11)
                                      & ? [X12] :
                                          ( ssList(X12)
                                          & app(X12,cons(X11,nil)) = X3
                                          & lt(X11,X9) ) ) ) ) ) )
                    | ( nil != X4
                      & nil = X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax84,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax84) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ? [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                          & ? [X6] :
                              ( ssList(X6)
                              & ? [X7] :
                                  ( ssList(X7)
                                  & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
                                  & app(X5,X7) = X1 ) ) )
                      | ! [X8] :
                          ( ssList(X8)
                         => ( app(X3,X8) != X4
                            | ~ strictorderedP(X3)
                            | ? [X9] :
                                ( ssItem(X9)
                                & ? [X10] :
                                    ( ssList(X10)
                                    & app(cons(X9,nil),X10) = X8
                                    & ? [X11] :
                                        ( ssItem(X11)
                                        & ? [X12] :
                                            ( ssList(X12)
                                            & app(X12,cons(X11,nil)) = X3
                                            & lt(X11,X9) ) ) ) ) ) )
                      | ( nil != X4
                        & nil = X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X476,X477,X478,X480,X481,X482,X483] :
      ( ssList(esk48_0)
      & ssList(esk49_0)
      & ssList(esk50_0)
      & ssList(esk51_0)
      & esk49_0 = esk51_0
      & esk48_0 = esk50_0
      & ( ~ ssList(X476)
        | ~ ssList(X477)
        | ~ ssList(X478)
        | app(app(X476,X477),X478) != esk49_0
        | app(X476,X478) != esk48_0 )
      & ssList(esk52_0)
      & app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = esk51_0
      & strictorderedP(esk50_0)
      & ( ~ ssItem(X480)
        | ~ ssList(X481)
        | app(cons(X480,nil),X481) != esk52_0
        | ~ ssItem(X482)
        | ~ ssList(X483)
        | app(X483,cons(X482,nil)) != esk50_0
        | ~ lt(X482,X480) )
      & ( nil = esk51_0
        | nil != esk50_0 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk49_0
    | app(X1,X3) != esk48_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    esk48_0 = esk50_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X448] :
      ( ~ ssList(X448)
      | app(X448,nil) = X448 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax84])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk48_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk51_0
    | app(X1,X3) != esk50_0
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( app(X1,nil) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk50_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(esk50_0,X1),nil) != esk51_0
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])])]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = esk51_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk52_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk51_0,nil) != esk51_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk51_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]),c_0_19])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SWC009+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 04:13:46 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.35/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.35/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.35/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.35/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.35/1.73  % Total time : 1.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------