↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC026+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:56:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 14.40s 7.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (  95 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  131 (  46   ~;  42   |;  35   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( ( ( nil = V
                        | nil != U )
                      & ( nil = U
                        | nil != V ) )
                    | ( nil = X
                      & nil != W )
                    | ( nil = W
                      & nil != X )
                    | U != W
                    | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( ( ( nil = V
                          | nil != U )
                        & ( nil = U
                          | nil != V ) )
                      | ( nil = X
                        & nil != W )
                      | ( nil = W
                        & nil != X )
                      | U != W
                      | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(nnf_87,plain,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ( ( nil != V
                      & nil = U )
                    | ( nil != U
                      & nil = V ) )
                  & ( nil != X
                    | nil = W )
                  & ( nil != W
                    | nil = X )
                  & W = U
                  & X = V
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( nil != sK1
        & nil = sK3 )
      | ( nil != sK3
        & nil = sK1 ) )
    & ( nil != sK0
      | nil = sK2 )
    & ( nil != sK2
      | nil = sK0 )
    & sK2 = sK3
    & sK0 = sK1
    & ssList(sK0)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK1,sK2,sK0]),skolemize(U,sK3),skolemize(V,sK1),skolemize(W,sK2),skolemize(X,sK0)],[nnf_87]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
    ( ( nil != sK1
      | nil != sK3 )
    & ( nil = sK3
      | nil = sK1 )
    & ( nil != sK0
      | nil = sK2 )
    & ( nil != sK2
      | nil = sK0 )
    & sK2 = sK3
    & sK0 = sK1
    & ssList(sK0)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_331,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_332,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_333,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK2
    | nil = sK0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2366,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK2
    | nil = sK1 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_331,c_333]) ).

cnf(c_2367,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK3
    | nil = sK1 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_2366]) ).

cnf(c_2368,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK3
    | sK1 = nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2367]) ).

cnf(c_334,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 != nil
    | sK1 = nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2368]) ).

cnf(c_335,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK0
    | nil = sK2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2369,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK0
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_335]) ).

cnf(c_2370,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK1
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_331,c_2369]) ).

cnf(c_2371,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK1
    | sK3 = nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2370]) ).

cnf(c_336,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 != nil
    | sK3 = nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2371]) ).

cnf(c_337,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sK3
    | nil = sK1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2372,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sK3
    | sK1 = nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_337]) ).

cnf(c_338,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = nil
    | sK1 = nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2372]) ).

cnf(c_339,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK1
    | nil != sK3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2373,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK1
    | sK3 != nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_339]) ).

cnf(c_340,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 != nil
    | sK3 != nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2373]) ).

cnf(c_2374,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = nil
    | sK3 = nil ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_336]) ).

cnf(c_2363,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 = nil,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2374]) ).

cnf(c_2375,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 = nil
    | sK1 = nil ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_334]) ).

cnf(c_2364,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 = nil,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2375]) ).

cnf(c_2376,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 != nil
    | nil != nil ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2363,c_340]) ).

cnf(c_2377,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != nil
    | nil != nil ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2364,c_2376]) ).

cnf(c_2378,negated_conjecture,
    nil != nil,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2377]) ).

cnf(c_2365,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2378]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC026+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:05:23 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/5.37  % Process 3100109 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.09/5.37  % Sat Sep 26 12:05:23 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/5.40  
% 0.09/5.40  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 14.40/7.29  
% 14.40/7.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 14.40/7.29  
% 14.40/7.29  % Proof 1 at 1.70 (+ 0.15) seconds.
% 14.40/7.29  % Length of proof is 14.
% 14.40/7.29  % Level of proof is 4.
% 14.40/7.29  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 14.40/7.29  % Given clauses 163.
% 14.40/7.29  
% 14.40/7.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------