↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNK-Non.f

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWC031-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:58:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.91s 1.11s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWC031-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 10:01:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43  The process was started by sandbox2 on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43  Sun Jun 12 10:01:06 2022
% 0.19/0.43  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 12260.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43  138 back subsumes 137.
% 0.19/0.43  148 back subsumes 142.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 433 during input processing: 0 [copy,433,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 335.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 279.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 278.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 277.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 267.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 254.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 253.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 252.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 215.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 203.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 202.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 201.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 200.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 183.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 180.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 178.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 174.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 171.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 147.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 144.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 136.
% 0.19/0.43  433 back subsumes 135.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.41/0.62  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.41/0.62  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.41/0.62  number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.41/0.62  number of clauses initially in problem: 398
% 0.41/0.62  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.41/0.62  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.41/0.62  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.41/0.62  absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.41/0.62     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.41/0.62     distinct function count: 46
% 0.41/0.62     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.41/0.62  
% 0.41/0.62  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.11  cons(skac3,app(nil,nil))=app(cons(skac3,nil),nil).
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.91/1.11  39 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1245.4 K.
% 0.91/1.11    type (bytes each)        gets      frees     in use      avail      bytes
% 0.91/1.11  sym_ent ( 304)              180          0        180          0     53.4 K
% 0.91/1.11  term (  32)               80815      75202       5613         12    175.8 K
% 0.91/1.11  rel (  40)                58265      52237       6028         10    235.9 K
% 0.91/1.11  term_ptr (  16)           23239       2028      21211         33    331.9 K
% 0.91/1.11  formula_ptr_2 (  56)          0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  fpa_head (  24)            1933         47       1886         10     44.4 K
% 0.91/1.11  fpa_tree (  56)           11129      11129          0         20      1.1 K
% 0.91/1.11  context (1288)            16960      16960          0         11     13.8 K
% 0.91/1.11  trail (  24)              96954      96954          0          6      0.1 K
% 0.91/1.11  imd_tree (  32)              38          9         29          9      1.2 K
% 0.91/1.11  imd_pos (4024)                0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  is_tree (  24)             1364         75       1289         20     30.7 K
% 0.91/1.11  is_pos (2424)             61777      61777          0          6     14.2 K
% 0.91/1.11  fsub_pos (  16)            8705       8705          0          1      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  literal (  32)            19365      15564       3801          2    118.8 K
% 0.91/1.11  clause (  88)              3505       2579        926          1     79.7 K
% 0.91/1.11  list ( 272)                  10          3          7          1      2.1 K
% 0.91/1.11  clash_nd (  80)            5977       5977          0          9      0.7 K
% 0.91/1.11  clause_ptr (  16)           833         81        752          3     11.8 K
% 0.91/1.11  int_ptr (  16)             7814       3993       3821          5     59.8 K
% 0.91/1.11  ci_ptr (  24)                 0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  link_node ( 120)              0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  ans_lit_node(  24)            0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  formula_box( 168)             0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  formula(  40)                 0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  formula_ptr(  16)             0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  cl_attribute(  24)            0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.91/1.11  me       0.00
% 0.91/1.11    forward subsume      0.00
% 0.91/1.11    delete cl time       0.00
% 0.91/1.11    keep cl time         0.00
% 0.91/1.11      hints time         0.00
% 0.91/1.11    print_cl time        0.00
% 0.91/1.11    conflict time        0.00
% 0.91/1.11    new demod time       0.00
% 0.91/1.11  post_process time      0.00
% 0.91/1.11    back demod time      0.00
% 0.91/1.11    back subsume         0.00
% 0.91/1.11    factor time          0.00
% 0.91/1.11  FINDER time            0.00
% 0.91/1.11    unindex time         0.00
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  true clauses given           1      (12.5%)
% 0.91/1.11  false clauses given          7
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.91/1.11     2  2         3
% 0.91/1.11     3  31        15
% 0.91/1.11     4  6         14
% 0.91/1.11     6  0         1
% 0.91/1.11     7  0         29
% 0.91/1.11     9  0         12
% 0.91/1.11    10  0         2
% 0.91/1.11    11  0         45
% 0.91/1.11    12  0         21
% 0.91/1.11    13  0         34
% 0.91/1.11    14  0         8
% 0.91/1.11    15  0         26
% 0.91/1.11    16  0         13
% 0.91/1.11    17  0         12
% 0.91/1.11    19  0         5
% 0.91/1.11    21  0         15
% 0.91/1.11    22  0         12
% 0.91/1.11    23  0         5
% 0.91/1.11  tot:  39        272      (87.5% true)
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.91/1.11   1:0     2:0     3:2     4:0     5:11    6:0     7:4     8:0     9:6    10:47  
% 0.91/1.11  11:6    12:0    13:0    14:0    15:0    16:0    17:0    18:0    19:0    20:1   
% 0.91/1.11  21:0    22:0    23:1    24:1    25:0    26:0    27:0    28:0    29:0    30:0   
% 0.91/1.11  31:0    32:0    33:0    34:0    35:0    36:0    37:0    38:0    39:0    40:0   
% 0.91/1.11  41:0    42:0    43:0    44:0    45:0    46:0    47:0    48:0    49:0    50:0   
% 0.91/1.11  51:0    52:0    53:0    54:0    55:0    56:1    57:0    58:0    59:0    60:1   
% 0.91/1.11  61:0    62:0    63:0    64:0    65:0    66:0    67:1    68:0    69:0    70:0   
% 0.91/1.11  71:0    72:0    73:0    74:0    75:0    76:0    77:0    78:0    79:0    80:0   
% 0.91/1.11  81:0    82:0    83:0    84:0    85:0    86:0    87:0    88:0    89:0    90:0   
% 0.91/1.11  91:0    92:0    93:0    94:0    95:0    96:0    97:0    98:0    99:0    
% 0.91/1.11  All others: 575.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------