%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SWC035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:18 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 12.22s 2.54s % Output : Proof 18.75s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWC035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 19:12:20 EDT 2023 % 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.62 ________ _____ % 0.21/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.21/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.21/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.21/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.21/0.62 (2023-06-19) % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.21/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.21/0.62 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.21/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.21/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.21/0.65 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.21/0.65 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.21/0.65 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.21/0.65 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.21/0.65 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.21/0.65 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.21/0.65 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 5.97/1.63 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 5.97/1.64 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 5.97/1.68 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 5.97/1.68 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 5.97/1.68 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 5.97/1.68 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 5.97/1.68 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 12.22/2.51 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 12.22/2.54 Prover 2: proved (1897ms) % 12.22/2.54 % 12.22/2.54 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 12.22/2.54 % 12.22/2.56 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 13.91/2.73 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 13.91/2.73 Prover 5: stopped % 13.91/2.75 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 13.91/2.75 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 13.91/2.78 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 13.91/2.78 Prover 6: stopped % 14.45/2.79 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.45/2.79 Prover 3: stopped % 14.45/2.80 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 14.45/2.82 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 14.45/2.94 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.45/2.98 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1) % 14.45/2.98 Prover 1: proved (2344ms) % 15.47/3.00 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 16.19/3.06 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 16.19/3.06 Prover 7: stopped % 16.19/3.07 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 16.19/3.09 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 16.19/3.10 Prover 10: stopped % 16.87/3.18 Prover 11: stopped % 18.23/3.34 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 18.23/3.34 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.23/3.34 Prover 8: stopped % 18.23/3.41 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.23/3.41 Prover 4: stopped % 18.23/3.41 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.23/3.41 Prover 0: stopped % 18.23/3.41 % 18.23/3.41 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 18.23/3.41 % 18.23/3.42 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 18.75/3.43 Assumptions after simplification: % 18.75/3.43 --------------------------------- % 18.75/3.43 % 18.75/3.43 (co1) % 18.75/3.43 $false % 18.75/3.43 % 18.75/3.43 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 18.75/3.44 -------------------------------------------- % 18.75/3.44 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20, % 18.75/3.44 ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32, % 18.75/3.44 ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, % 18.75/3.44 ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56, % 18.75/3.44 ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68, % 18.75/3.44 ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8, % 18.75/3.44 ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91, % 18.75/3.44 ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95 % 18.75/3.44 % 18.75/3.44 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 18.75/3.44 --------------------------------- % 18.75/3.44 % 18.75/3.44 Begin of proof % 18.75/3.44 | % 18.75/3.44 | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent. % 18.75/3.44 | % 18.75/3.44 End of proof % 18.75/3.44 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 18.75/3.44 % 18.75/3.44 2819ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------