↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC036+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:56:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.32s 1.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  40 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  19   ~;  14   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( ( nil = X
                      & nil != W )
                    | nil = U
                    | U != W
                    | V != X
                    | nil != V ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( ( nil = X
                        & nil != W )
                      | nil = U
                      | U != W
                      | V != X
                      | nil != V ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(nnf_87,plain,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ( nil != X
                    | nil = W )
                  & nil != U
                  & W = U
                  & X = V
                  & nil = V
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
    ( ( nil != sK1
      | nil = sK2 )
    & nil != sK3
    & sK2 = sK3
    & sK1 = sK0
    & nil = sK0
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK0)
    & ssList(sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK0,sK2,sK1]),skolemize(U,sK3),skolemize(V,sK0),skolemize(W,sK2),skolemize(X,sK1)],[nnf_87]) ).

cnf(c_331,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_332,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = nil,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_331]) ).

cnf(c_333,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_334,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 = nil,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_333]) ).

cnf(c_335,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_336,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_337,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 != nil,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_336]) ).

cnf(c_338,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK1
    | nil = sK2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_340,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK1
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_335,c_338]) ).

cnf(c_341,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != nil
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_340]) ).

cnf(c_342,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != nil
    | sK3 = nil ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_341]) ).

cnf(c_343,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 = nil,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_342]) ).

cnf(c_339,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_343]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SWC036+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.63  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.63  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.63  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.63  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.63  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.63  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.63  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.63  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:06:31 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.64  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.64  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.64  % Process 457665 was started by sandbox2 on n011,
% 0.17/0.64  % Sat Sep 26 12:06:31 2026
% 0.17/0.64  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.20/0.68  
% 0.20/0.68  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 3.32/1.14  
% 3.32/1.14  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.32/1.14  
% 3.32/1.14  % Proof 1 at 0.44 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 3.32/1.14  % Length of proof is 10.
% 3.32/1.14  % Level of proof is 4.
% 3.32/1.14  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 3.32/1.14  % Given clauses 0.
% 3.32/1.14  
% 3.32/1.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------