%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWC038-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:07:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.82s 6.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named f300ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_9175ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f84,axiom,
! [X0] :
( nil = X0
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ frontsegP(nil,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause84) ).
fof(f202,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).
fof(f203,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_4) ).
fof(f204,negated_conjecture,
nil = sk2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f205,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f206,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f207,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f211,negated_conjecture,
( frontsegP(sk4,sk3)
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
fof(f212,plain,
nil = sk4,
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f204,f205]) ).
fof(f244,plain,
! [X0] :
( sk4 = X0
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ frontsegP(sk4,X0) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f84,f212,f212]) ).
fof(f267,plain,
sk3 != sk4,
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f207,f212,f206]) ).
fof(f271,plain,
( frontsegP(sk4,sk3)
| sk3 = sk4 ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f211,f212]) ).
tcf(c_329,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = sk4 )
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ frontsegP(sk4,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f244]) ).
tcf(c_390,negated_conjecture,
( ( app(sk4,sk4) = sk4 )
| ~ ssList(sk4) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f300]) ).
tcf(c_433,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f202]) ).
tcf(c_434,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f203]) ).
tcf(c_435,negated_conjecture,
sk3 != sk4,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f267]) ).
tcf(c_437,negated_conjecture,
( frontsegP(sk4,sk3)
| ( sk3 = sk4 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f271]) ).
tcf(c_551,negated_conjecture,
frontsegP(sk4,sk3),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_437,c_435,c_437]) ).
tcf(c_555,negated_conjecture,
app(sk4,sk4) = sk4,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_390,c_434,c_390]) ).
tcf(c_6426,definition,
iPr_def_12 = app(sk4,sk4),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_6427,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_12 = sk4,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_555,c_6426]) ).
tcf(c_6428,negated_conjecture,
frontsegP(sk4,sk3),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_551]) ).
tcf(c_6432,negated_conjecture,
sk3 != sk4,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_435]) ).
tcf(c_6450,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = sk4 )
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ frontsegP(sk4,X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_329]) ).
tcf(c_6477,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_433]) ).
tcf(c_8969,plain,
frontsegP(iPr_def_12,sk3),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6428,c_6427]) ).
tcf(c_8974,plain,
sk3 != iPr_def_12,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6432,c_6427]) ).
tcf(c_9162,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = iPr_def_12 )
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ frontsegP(iPr_def_12,X0) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6450,c_6427]) ).
tcf(c_9172,plain,
( ( sk3 = iPr_def_12 )
| ~ ssList(sk3) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8969,c_9162]) ).
tcf(c_9175,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9172,c_8974,c_6477]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWC038-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.39 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.40 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 16:02:56 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/5.40 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/5.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.48
% 0.16/5.48 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/5.48
% 0.16/5.48 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.16/5.50 % Proving...
% 2.82/6.36 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.82/6.36 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.82/6.36 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.82/6.36 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 2 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Proving...
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 %
% 2.82/6.36 % clauses 181
% 2.82/6.36 % conjectures 51
% 2.82/6.36 % EPR 56
% 2.82/6.36 % Horn 153
% 2.82/6.36 % unary 62
% 2.82/6.36 % binary 21
% 2.82/6.36 % lits 545
% 2.82/6.36 % lits eq 71
% 2.82/6.36 % fd_pure 0
% 2.82/6.36 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.82/6.36 % fd_cond 15
% 2.82/6.36 % fd_pseudo_cond 14
% 2.82/6.36 % AC symbols 0
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------
% 2.82/6.36 % Current options:
% 2.82/6.36 % ------
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 %
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % ------ Proving...
% 2.82/6.36 %
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.82/6.36
% 2.82/6.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------