↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC039-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:42:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 5.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  22 unt;   6 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (  37 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sk2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(clause119,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause119) ).

cnf(co1_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_20) ).

cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).

cnf(clause85,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause85) ).

cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).

cnf(co1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).

cnf(clause118,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause118) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sk2,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk1,
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause119]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = sk4 ),
    co1_20 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    sk3 != nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    co1_18 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk7),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause85]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    co1_17 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(app(sk6,sk3))
    | sk7 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk6),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk3),
    co1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause118]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    sk7 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk6,sk3),nil) = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(app(sk6,sk3))
    | app(sk6,sk3) = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk6,sk3) = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_37]),c_0_30]),c_0_29])]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWC039-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.55  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.55  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.55  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.55  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.55  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.55  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.55  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.55  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:51:33 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.56  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.60  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/5.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % new_bool_1 with pid 519802 completed with status 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/5.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/5.63  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/5.63  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/5.63  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 519805 completed with status 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/5.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/5.63  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/5.63  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/5.63  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/5.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.13/5.63  
% 0.13/5.63  % Proof found!
% 0.13/5.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/5.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/5.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 207
% 0.13/5.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 149
% 0.13/5.63  % Initial clauses                      : 58
% 0.13/5.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 58
% 0.13/5.63  % Processed clauses                    : 48
% 0.13/5.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 7
% 0.13/5.63  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.13/5.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 37
% 0.13/5.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.13/5.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.13/5.63  % Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.13/5.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.13/5.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Paramodulations                      : 18
% 0.13/5.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.13/5.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 58
% 0.13/5.63  % ...of those cached                   : 45
% 0.13/5.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/5.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/5.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/5.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/5.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/5.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 0.13/5.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.13/5.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/5.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.13/5.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.13/5.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% 0.13/5.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 106
% 0.13/5.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.13/5.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62
% 0.13/5.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.13/5.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.13/5.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.13/5.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.13/5.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.13/5.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/5.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3946
% 0.13/5.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 905
% 0.13/5.63  
% 0.13/5.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/5.63  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.13/5.63  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.13/5.63  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.13/5.63  % Maximum resident set size: 3816 pages
% 0.13/5.63  
% 0.13/5.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/5.63  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.13/5.63  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.13/5.63  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.13/5.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/5.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------