↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWC040+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:02:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.76s 1.36s
% Output   : Refutation 2.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  12 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (  52 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  102 (  29   ~;  21   |;  40   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  12   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( nil != X1
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X0 != X2
                    | nil = X0
                    | ( nil != X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ( ! [X4] :
                          ( ssItem(X4)
                         => ! [X5] :
                              ( ssList(X5)
                             => ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != X2
                                | app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X3 ) ) )
                      & neq(X3,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( nil != X1
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X0 != X2
                      | nil = X0
                      | ( nil != X2
                        & nil = X3 )
                      | ( ! [X4] :
                            ( ssItem(X4)
                           => ! [X5] :
                                ( ssList(X5)
                               => ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != X2
                                  | app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X3 ) ) )
                        & neq(X3,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f96]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( nil = X1
                  & X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & nil != X0
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 )
                  & ( ? [X4] :
                        ( ? [X5] :
                            ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
                            & app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
                            & ssList(X5) )
                        & ssItem(X4) )
                    | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( nil = X1
                  & X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & nil != X0
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 )
                  & ( ? [X4] :
                        ( ? [X5] :
                            ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
                            & app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
                            & ssList(X5) )
                        & ssItem(X4) )
                    | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ( nil = sK1
    & sK1 = sK3
    & sK0 = sK2
    & nil != sK0
    & ( nil = sK2
      | nil != sK3 )
    & ( ( sK2 = app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5)
        & sK3 = app(sK5,cons(sK4,nil))
        & ssList(sK5)
        & ssItem(sK4) )
      | ~ neq(sK3,nil) )
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X4,sK4),skolemize(X5,sK5)],[f99]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | nil != sK3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    nil != sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    nil = sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    nil = sK3,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f139,f138]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    sK2 != sK3,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f136,f167,f137]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ( sK2 = sK3
    | sK3 != sK3 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f135,f167,f167]) ).

fof(f187,definition,
    ~ sP10(sK2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])],[inequality_splitting_name_introduction]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    sP10(sK3),
    inference(inequality_splitting,[],[f168,f187]) ).

fof(f189,definition,
    ~ sP11(sK3),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])],[inequality_splitting_name_introduction]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ( sK2 = sK3
    | sP11(sK3) ),
    inference(inequality_splitting,[],[f169,f189]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f190,f189]) ).

fof(f205,plain,
    ~ sP10(sK3),
    inference(superposition,[],[f187,f204]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f205,f188]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWC040+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 07:33:06 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003371)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=1196059435:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)First to succeed.
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1003371"
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003377)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=1396043379:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003376)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=3727575379:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003378)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=2453039716:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003382)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=2559473686:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003380)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=3645359582:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003381)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=1899612027:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003380)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003382)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003381)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.76/1.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.76/1.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)------------------------------
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Peak memory usage: 89 MB
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)------------------------------
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003379)------------------------------
% 2.76/1.36  % (1003371)Success in time 0.31 s
% 2.76/1.36  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------