%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem : SWC041+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:56:38 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 9.53s 11.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 121 ( 64 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 141 ( 44 ~; 37 |; 47 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 26 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn 21 !; 11 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax83,axiom,
! [U] :
( ssList(U)
=> ! [V] :
( ssList(V)
=> ( nil = app(U,V)
<=> ( nil = U
& nil = V ) ) ) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',ax83) ).
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [U] :
( ssList(U)
=> ! [V] :
( ssList(V)
=> ! [W] :
( ssList(W)
=> ! [X] :
( ssList(X)
=> ( ( nil = W
& nil != X )
| ! [Y] :
( ssList(Y)
=> ( ? [Z] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) = W
& ssList(X2) )
& app(cons(Z,nil),X1) = Y
& ssList(X1) )
& ssItem(Z) )
| ~ equalelemsP(W)
| app(W,Y) != X ) )
| nil = U
| U != W
| V != X
| nil != V ) ) ) ) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [U] :
( ssList(U)
=> ! [V] :
( ssList(V)
=> ! [W] :
( ssList(W)
=> ! [X] :
( ssList(X)
=> ( ( nil = W
& nil != X )
| ! [Y] :
( ssList(Y)
=> ( ? [Z] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) = W
& ssList(X2) )
& app(cons(Z,nil),X1) = Y
& ssList(X1) )
& ssItem(Z) )
| ~ equalelemsP(W)
| app(W,Y) != X ) )
| nil = U
| U != W
| V != X
| nil != V ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
cnf(c_314,plain,
( nil = A
| app(A,B) != nil
| ~ ssList(B)
| ~ ssList(A) ),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax83]) ).
fof(nnf_87,plain,
? [U] :
( ? [V] :
( ? [W] :
( ? [X] :
( ( nil != W
| nil = X )
& ? [Y] :
( ! [Z] :
( ! [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) != W
| ~ ssList(X2) )
| app(cons(Z,nil),X1) != Y
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssItem(Z) )
& equalelemsP(W)
& app(W,Y) = X
& ssList(Y) )
& nil != U
& W = U
& X = V
& nil = V
& ssList(X) )
& ssList(W) )
& ssList(V) )
& ssList(U) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).
fof(sk_co1_neg_sk,plain,
( ( nil != sK3
| nil = sK2 )
& ! [Z] :
( ! [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) != sK3
| ~ ssList(X2) )
| app(cons(Z,nil),X1) != sK4
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssItem(Z) )
& equalelemsP(sK3)
& app(sK3,sK4) = sK2
& ssList(sK4)
& nil != sK0
& sK3 = sK0
& sK2 = sK1
& nil = sK1
& ssList(sK2)
& ssList(sK3)
& ssList(sK1)
& ssList(sK0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK3,sK2,sK4]),skolemize(U,sK0),skolemize(V,sK1),skolemize(W,sK3),skolemize(X,sK2),skolemize(Y,sK4)],[nnf_87]) ).
fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
( ( nil != sK3
| nil = sK2 )
& ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
( app(VAR_2,cons(VAR_0,nil)) != sK3
| ~ ssList(VAR_2)
| app(cons(VAR_0,nil),VAR_1) != sK4
| ~ ssList(VAR_1)
| ~ ssItem(VAR_0) )
& equalelemsP(sK3)
& app(sK3,sK4) = sK2
& ssList(sK4)
& nil != sK0
& sK3 = sK0
& sK2 = sK1
& nil = sK1
& ssList(sK2)
& ssList(sK3)
& ssList(sK1)
& ssList(sK0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg_sk]) ).
cnf(c_329,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sK0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).
cnf(c_333,negated_conjecture,
nil = sK1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).
cnf(c_334,negated_conjecture,
sK1 = nil,
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_333]) ).
cnf(c_335,negated_conjecture,
sK2 = sK1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).
cnf(c_336,negated_conjecture,
sK2 = nil,
inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_335]) ).
cnf(c_337,negated_conjecture,
sK3 = sK0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).
cnf(c_338,negated_conjecture,
nil != sK0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).
cnf(c_339,negated_conjecture,
sK0 != nil,
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_338]) ).
cnf(c_340,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sK4),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).
cnf(c_341,negated_conjecture,
app(sK3,sK4) = sK2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).
cnf(c_2364,negated_conjecture,
app(sK0,sK4) = sK2,
inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_341]) ).
cnf(c_342,negated_conjecture,
app(sK0,sK4) = nil,
inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_336,c_2364]) ).
cnf(c_2365,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sK0
| ~ ssList(sK4)
| ~ ssList(sK0) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_342,c_314]) ).
cnf(c_2366,negated_conjecture,
( sK0 = nil
| ~ ssList(sK4)
| ~ ssList(sK0) ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2365]) ).
cnf(c_2367,negated_conjecture,
( sK0 = nil
| ~ ssList(sK4) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_329,c_2366]) ).
cnf(c_2368,negated_conjecture,
sK0 = nil,
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_340,c_2367]) ).
cnf(c_2363,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_339,c_2368]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWC041+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/10.53 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/10.53 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/10.53 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/10.53 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/10.53 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/10.53 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/10.53 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/10.53 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:06:51 UTC 2026
% 0.13/10.53 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/10.54 % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.13/10.54 % Process 1209117 was started by sandbox2 on n006,
% 0.13/10.54 % Sat Sep 26 12:06:51 2026
% 0.13/10.54 % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/10.56
% 0.13/10.56 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 9.53/11.83
% 9.53/11.83 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 9.53/11.83
% 9.53/11.83 % Proof 1 at 1.07 (+ 0.08) seconds.
% 9.53/11.83 % Length of proof is 15.
% 9.53/11.83 % Level of proof is 5.
% 9.53/11.83 % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 9.53/11.83 % Given clauses 163.
% 9.53/11.83
% 9.53/11.83 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------