↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWC041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:56:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.94s 1.15s
% Output   : Refutation 0.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   9 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause118,axiom,
    ( app(X,Y) != nil
    | ~ ssList(Y)
    | ~ ssList(X)
    | nil = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause118) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sk2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    nil = sk4,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_6,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk3,sk5) = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).

cnf(194,plain,
    app(sk1,sk5) = nil,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_10,189,co1_7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5449,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause118,194,co1_9,co1_1,co1_8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SWC041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 17:42:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T17:42:39
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-06-12T17:42:39
% 0.94/1.15  
% 0.94/1.15  
% 0.94/1.15  #||
% 0.94/1.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.15  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.15  ||#
% 0.94/1.15  
% 0.94/1.15  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.94/1.15  ;      8544 formulas have been input or derived (from 125 formulas).
% 0.94/1.15  ;      5449 (64%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.94/1.15  ;            7 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.94/1.15  ;         5442 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.94/1.15  ; 
% 0.94/1.15  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.036   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.006   1%   Assert                       (198 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.254  37%   Process new row              (8,500 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.188  27%   Resolution                   (248 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (124 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.013   2%   Condensing                   (1,510 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.019   3%   Forward subsumption          (1,510 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.030   4%   Backward subsumption         (1,508 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.002   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,255 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.051   7%   Forward simplification       (8,500 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.039   6%   Backward simplification      (5,445 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.004   1%   Ordering                     (2,529 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.048   7%   Other
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.691        Total
% 0.94/1.15  ;     0.692        Real time
% 0.94/1.15  ; 
% 0.94/1.15  ; Term-hash-array has 9,433 terms in all.
% 0.94/1.15  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,508 entries (1,508 at peak, 1,508 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.94/1.15  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,311 nodes (1,311 at peak, 1,311 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.94/1.15  ;  Retrieved 6,860 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,510 calls.
% 0.94/1.15  ;  Retrieved 6,824 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,508 calls.
% 0.94/1.15  ; Path-index has 9,438 entries (9,438 at peak, 9,441 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.94/1.15  ; Path-index has 4,837 nodes (4,837 at peak, 4,840 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.94/1.15  ; Trie-index has 9,438 entries (9,438 at peak, 9,441 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.94/1.15  ; Trie-index has 23,763 nodes (23,763 at peak, 23,766 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.94/1.15  ; Retrieved 3,170 generalization terms in 13,526 calls.
% 0.94/1.15  ; Retrieved 3,978 instance terms in 3,936 calls.
% 0.94/1.15  ; Retrieved 480,230 unifiable terms in 11,650 calls.
% 0.94/1.15  ; 
% 0.94/1.15  ; The agenda of rows to process has 34 entries:
% 0.94/1.15  ;     2 with value 4               3 with value 8                6 with value 11
% 0.94/1.15  ;     1 with value 5              21 with value 10               1 with value 15
% 0.94/1.15  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 67 entries:
% 0.94/1.15  ;     1 with value 17              2 with value 23               1 with value 32
% 0.94/1.15  ;     7 with value 18              3 with value 24               1 with value 33
% 0.94/1.15  ;     2 with value 19              8 with value 25               1 with value 35
% 0.94/1.15  ;    11 with value 20              3 with value 26               2 with value 40
% 0.94/1.15  ;     9 with value 21              6 with value 27               3 with value 44
% 0.94/1.15  ;     5 with value 22              2 with value 29
% 0.94/1.15  ; The agenda of rows to give has 5250 entries:
% 0.94/1.15  ;    37 with value (4 5)         759 with value (4 11)         144 with value (4 16)
% 0.94/1.15  ;     2 with value (4 6)         528 with value (4 12)         252 with value (4 17)
% 0.94/1.15  ;   103 with value (4 7)         309 with value (4 13)          48 with value (4 19)
% 0.94/1.15  ;   192 with value (4 8)         762 with value (4 14)          42 with value (4 21)
% 0.94/1.15  ;   301 with value (4 9)         806 with value (4 15)          12 with value (4 25)
% 0.94/1.15  ;   953 with value (4 10)
% 0.94/1.15  Evaluation took:
% 0.94/1.15    0.692 seconds of real time
% 0.94/1.15    0.632198 seconds of user run time
% 0.94/1.15    0.059898 seconds of system run time
% 0.94/1.15    [Run times include 0.051 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.94/1.15    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.94/1.15    0 page faults and
% 0.94/1.15    58,088,408 bytes consed.
% 0.94/1.15  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.94/1.15  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T17:42:40
% 0.94/1.15  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.94/1.15  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------