↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC042+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:42:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 5.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  61 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  46   ~;  43   |;  36   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   29 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  25   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( ( nil = X3
                      & nil != X4 )
                    | ! [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                       => ( ? [X6] :
                              ( ? [X7] :
                                  ( ? [X8] :
                                      ( ? [X9] :
                                          ( leq(X8,X6)
                                          & app(X9,cons(X8,nil)) = X3
                                          & ssList(X9) )
                                      & ssItem(X8) )
                                  & app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
                                  & ssList(X7) )
                              & ssItem(X6) )
                          | ~ totalorderedP(X3)
                          | app(X3,X5) != X4 ) )
                    | nil = X1
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X2 != X4
                    | nil != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax83,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( nil = app(X1,X2)
          <=> ( nil = X1
              & nil = X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax83) ).

fof(ax84,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax84) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( nil = X3
                        & nil != X4 )
                      | ! [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                         => ( ? [X6] :
                                ( ? [X7] :
                                    ( ? [X8] :
                                        ( ? [X9] :
                                            ( leq(X8,X6)
                                            & app(X9,cons(X8,nil)) = X3
                                            & ssList(X9) )
                                        & ssItem(X8) )
                                    & app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
                                    & ssList(X7) )
                                & ssItem(X6) )
                            | ~ totalorderedP(X3)
                            | app(X3,X5) != X4 ) )
                      | nil = X1
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4
                      | nil != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( nil = X3
                        & nil != X4 )
                      | ! [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                         => ( ? [X6] :
                                ( ? [X7] :
                                    ( ? [X8] :
                                        ( ? [X9] :
                                            ( leq(X8,X6)
                                            & app(X9,cons(X8,nil)) = X3
                                            & ssList(X9) )
                                        & ssItem(X8) )
                                    & app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
                                    & ssList(X7) )
                                & ssItem(X6) )
                            | ~ totalorderedP(X3)
                            | app(X3,X5) != X4 ) )
                      | nil = X1
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4
                      | nil != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( nil != esk3_0
        | nil = esk4_0 )
      & ( ~ leq(X17,X15)
        | app(X18,cons(X17,nil)) != esk3_0
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | ~ ssItem(X17)
        | app(cons(X15,nil),X16) != esk5_0
        | ~ ssList(X16)
        | ~ ssItem(X15) )
      & totalorderedP(esk3_0)
      & app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0
      & ssList(esk5_0)
      & nil != esk1_0
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & nil = esk2_0
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    nil = esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X54,X55] :
      ( ( ~ ssList(X54)
        | ~ ssList(X55)
        | nil = app(X54,X55)
        | nil != X54
        | nil != X55 )
      & ( ~ ssList(X54)
        | ~ ssList(X55)
        | nil != app(X54,X55)
        | nil = X54 )
      & ( ~ ssList(X54)
        | ~ ssList(X55)
        | nil != app(X54,X55)
        | nil = X55 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax83])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil != app(X2,X1)
    | nil = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X56] :
      ( app(X56,nil) = X56
      | ~ ssList(X56) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax84])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    esk5_0 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    nil != esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk3_0,nil) = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 != nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_13])]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWC042+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/5.66  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.20/5.66  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/5.66  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/5.66  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/5.66  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/5.66  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/5.66  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/5.66  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:50:51 UTC 2026
% 0.20/5.66  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/5.67  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/5.71  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/5.71  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/5.73  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/5.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/5.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % new_bool_3 with pid 2354306 completed with status 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/5.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/5.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/5.73  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/5.73  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/5.73  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2354309 completed with status 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/5.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/5.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/5.73  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/5.73  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/5.73  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/5.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.73  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.23/5.73  
% 0.23/5.73  % Proof found!
% 0.23/5.73  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/5.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/5.73  % Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.23/5.73  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 56
% 0.23/5.73  % Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.23/5.73  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.23/5.73  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 73
% 0.23/5.73  % Processed clauses                    : 57
% 0.23/5.73  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.23/5.73  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.23/5.73  % ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 0.23/5.73  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.23/5.73  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.23/5.73  % Generated clauses                    : 25
% 0.23/5.73  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.23/5.73  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Paramodulations                      : 22
% 0.23/5.73  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.23/5.73  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Total rewrite steps                  : 29
% 0.23/5.73  % ...of those cached                   : 22
% 0.23/5.73  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/5.73  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/5.73  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/5.73  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/5.73  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/5.73  % Current number of processed clauses  : 44
% 0.23/5.73  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
% 0.23/5.73  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/5.73  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.23/5.73  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
% 0.23/5.73  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.23/5.73  % ...number of literals in the above   : 150
% 0.23/5.73  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.23/5.73  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 59
% 0.23/5.73  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.23/5.73  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.23/5.73  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.23/5.73  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.23/5.73  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.23/5.73  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/5.73  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7324
% 0.23/5.73  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1983
% 0.23/5.73  
% 0.23/5.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/5.73  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.23/5.73  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/5.73  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.23/5.73  % Maximum resident set size: 3728 pages
% 0.23/5.73  
% 0.23/5.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/5.73  % User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.23/5.73  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.23/5.73  % Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.23/5.73  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.23/5.73  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------