↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWC044+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:07:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.56s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named f599ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_11933ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f52,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ( rearsegP(nil,X0)
      <=> nil = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax52) ).

fof(f84,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => app(X0,nil) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax84) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( nil = X0
                    | ~ rearsegP(X3,X2)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3
                    | nil != X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( nil = X0
                      | ~ rearsegP(X3,X2)
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3
                      | nil != X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f96]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ( rearsegP(nil,X0)
      <=> nil = X0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | app(X0,nil) = X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & nil != X0
                  & rearsegP(X3,X2)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & nil != X0
                  & rearsegP(X3,X2)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f284,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ( ( ~ rearsegP(nil,X0)
          | nil = X0 )
        & ( nil != X0
          | rearsegP(nil,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( ssList(sK53)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK56)
    & nil != sK53
    & rearsegP(sK56,sK55)
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56
    & nil = sK54 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56]),skolemize(X0,sK53),skolemize(X1,sK54),skolemize(X2,sK55),skolemize(X3,sK56)],[f222]) ).

fof(f436,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ rearsegP(nil,X0)
      | nil = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f284]) ).

fof(f482,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | app(X0,nil) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f201]) ).

fof(f496,plain,
    ssList(sK53),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f497,plain,
    ssList(sK54),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f500,plain,
    nil != sK53,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f501,plain,
    rearsegP(sK56,sK55),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f502,plain,
    sK53 = sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f503,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f504,plain,
    nil = sK54,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f505,plain,
    nil = sK56,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f504,f503]) ).

fof(f523,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ rearsegP(sK56,X0)
      | sK56 = X0 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f436,f505,f505]) ).

fof(f561,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | app(X0,sK56) = X0 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f482,f505]) ).

fof(f564,plain,
    sK55 != sK56,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f500,f505,f502]) ).

fof(f565,plain,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f497,f503]) ).

fof(f566,plain,
    ssList(sK55),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f496,f502]) ).

tcf(c_189,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK56 )
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ rearsegP(sK56,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f523]) ).

tcf(c_229,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( app(sK56,sK56) = sK56 )
    | ~ ssList(sK56) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f599]) ).

tcf(c_232,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( app(X0,sK56) = X0 )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).

tcf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
    rearsegP(sK56,sK55),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f501]) ).

tcf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    sK56 != sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f564]) ).

tcf(c_250,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f565]) ).

tcf(c_251,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK55),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f566]) ).

tcf(c_292,plain,
    ( ( app(sK56,sK56) = sK56 )
    | ~ ssList(sK56) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_232]) ).

tcf(c_364,negated_conjecture,
    app(sK56,sK56) = sK56,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_229,c_250,c_292]) ).

tcf(c_8769,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = app(sK56,sK56),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_8776,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 = sK56,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_364,c_8769]) ).

tcf(c_8780,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK55),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_251]) ).

tcf(c_8781,negated_conjecture,
    sK56 != sK55,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_247]) ).

tcf(c_8782,negated_conjecture,
    rearsegP(sK56,sK55),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_246]) ).

tcf(c_8811,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK56 )
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ rearsegP(sK56,X0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_189]) ).

tcf(c_11623,plain,
    rearsegP(iPr_def_10,sK55),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8782,c_8776]) ).

tcf(c_11628,plain,
    sK55 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8781,c_8776]) ).

tcf(c_11920,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = iPr_def_10 )
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ rearsegP(iPr_def_10,X0) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8811,c_8776]) ).

tcf(c_11931,plain,
    ( ( sK55 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ ssList(sK55) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_11623,c_11920]) ).

tcf(c_11933,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11931,c_11628,c_8780]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC044+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 16:04:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.41  
% 0.03/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.03/0.41  
% 0.03/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.03/0.42  % Proving...
% 3.56/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.56/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.56/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % 
% 3.56/1.27  % clauses                               184
% 3.56/1.27  % conjectures                           51
% 3.56/1.27  % EPR                                   53
% 3.56/1.27  % Horn                                  116
% 3.56/1.27  % unary                                 20
% 3.56/1.27  % binary                                40
% 3.56/1.27  % lits                                  622
% 3.56/1.27  % lits eq                               80
% 3.56/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.56/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.56/1.27  % fd_cond                               21
% 3.56/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        14
% 3.56/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.56/1.27  % Current options:
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.56/1.27  % 
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/1.27  
% 3.56/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.56/1.28  
% 3.56/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------