%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWC047-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:42:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 15 unt; 2 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 21 equ; 36 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rearsegP(sk1,X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| nil = sk2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
sk4 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| nil = sk2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).
cnf(clause59,axiom,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| rearsegP(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause59) ).
cnf(clause115,axiom,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ neq(X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause115) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rearsegP(sk1,X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| nil = sk2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
sk4 = sk3,
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rearsegP(sk1,X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| nil = sk2 ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| nil = sk2 ),
co1_8 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| sk2 = nil ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk2),
co1_2 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| rearsegP(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause59]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ neq(X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause115]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rearsegP(sk2,sk2)
| sk2 = nil ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| rearsegP(X1,X1) ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ neq(X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
neq(nil,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWC047-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:54:03 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % new_bool_3 with pid 2807120 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2807123 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.18/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.18/0.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 196
% 0.18/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 156
% 0.18/0.46 % Initial clauses : 40
% 0.18/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 40
% 0.18/0.46 % Processed clauses : 47
% 0.18/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.18/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 43
% 0.18/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 0.18/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.18/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.18/0.46 % Generated clauses : 37
% 0.18/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.18/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.18/0.46 % Paramodulations : 29
% 0.18/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.18/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 46
% 0.18/0.46 % ...of those cached : 37
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.18/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.18/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.18/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.18/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 106
% 0.18/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.18/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 100
% 0.18/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.18/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.18/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.18/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.18/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.18/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3642
% 0.18/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 921
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 3812 pages
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.47 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.18/0.47 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.18/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.18/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------