↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC058-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:42:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   59 (  18 unt;  10 nHn;  57 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  148 (  47 equ;  83 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = sk2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(clause173,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause173) ).

cnf(clause131,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2)
    | app(skaf46(X1,X2),X2) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause131) ).

cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( rearsegP(sk4,sk3)
    | nil = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk3,nil)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(clause57,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause57) ).

cnf(clause50,axiom,
    ssList(skaf46(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause50) ).

cnf(clause73,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause73) ).

cnf(clause119,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause119) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(clause115,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause115) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = sk2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause173]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2)
    | app(skaf46(X1,X2),X2) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause131]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( rearsegP(sk4,sk3)
    | nil = sk3 ),
    co1_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    co1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = sk2 ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk3,nil)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    co1_11 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2)
    | app(skaf46(X1,X2),X2) = X1 ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( rearsegP(sk4,sk1)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    co1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk4),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk4,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk1,nil)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause57]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(app(app(X1,X2),X3))
    | segmentP(app(app(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk1
    | app(skaf46(sk4,sk1),sk1) = sk4 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
    ssList(skaf46(X1,X2)),
    clause50 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause73]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause119]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk4,sk1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,sk1)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(app(sk4,X1))
    | segmentP(app(sk4,X1),sk1)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_28]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_42,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    c_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause115]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk4,sk1)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(sk4,sk1)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_29]),c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk4
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_34]),c_0_28]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    c_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    c_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sk1,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | neq(sk4,nil) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk1,sk1)
    | sk4 = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_51]),c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk4,sk1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_51]),c_0_51])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = sk1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk1,sk1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_57]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWC058-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.47  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.47  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:52:25 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.48  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.54  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.54  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.67  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.67  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.67  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 408495 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.24/0.67  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.67  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.67  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.67  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.67  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with pid 408504 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k
% 0.24/0.67  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.67  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.67  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.67  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.67  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.67  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.67  
% 0.24/0.67  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.67  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.67  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.67  % Parsed axioms                        : 199
% 0.24/0.67  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Initial clauses                      : 199
% 0.24/0.67  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 199
% 0.24/0.67  % Processed clauses                    : 479
% 0.24/0.67  % ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.24/0.67  % ...subsumed                          : 131
% 0.24/0.67  % ...remaining for further processing  : 344
% 0.24/0.67  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 88
% 0.24/0.67  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.24/0.67  % Backward-rewritten                   : 137
% 0.24/0.67  % Generated clauses                    : 1147
% 0.24/0.67  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1078
% 0.24/0.67  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 18
% 0.24/0.67  % Paramodulations                      : 1053
% 0.24/0.67  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Equation resolutions                 : 95
% 0.24/0.67  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1265
% 0.24/0.67  % ...of those cached                   : 1186
% 0.24/0.67  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.67  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.67  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.67  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.67  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.67  % Current number of processed clauses  : 182
% 0.24/0.67  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 52
% 0.24/0.67  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.67  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.24/0.67  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 128
% 0.24/0.67  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 783
% 0.24/0.67  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4301
% 0.24/0.67  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Current number of archived clauses   : 139
% 0.24/0.67  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11234
% 0.24/0.67  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2152
% 0.24/0.67  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 117
% 0.24/0.67  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.24/0.67  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.24/0.67  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.24/0.67  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.67  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 29587
% 0.24/0.67  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 544
% 0.24/0.67  
% 0.24/0.67  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.67  % User time                : 0.081 s
% 0.24/0.67  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.67  % Total time               : 0.088 s
% 0.24/0.67  % Maximum resident set size: 4068 pages
% 0.24/0.67  
% 0.24/0.67  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.67  % User time                : 0.323 s
% 0.24/0.67  % System time              : 0.031 s
% 0.24/0.67  % Total time               : 0.354 s
% 0.24/0.67  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.24/0.67  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------