↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC080-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:44:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.79s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  19 unt;   1 nHn;  47 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  117 (  14 equ;  73 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause173,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause173) ).

cnf(clause74,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause74) ).

cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk2,nil)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(clause132,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ frontsegP(X1,X2)
    | app(X2,skaf45(X1,X2)) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause132) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(clause51,axiom,
    ssList(skaf45(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause51) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | neq(sk5,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | frontsegP(sk3,sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).

cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | frontsegP(sk4,sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).

cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).

cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause173]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause74]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ frontsegP(X1,X2)
    | app(X2,skaf45(X1,X2)) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause132]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | segmentP(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ frontsegP(X1,X2)
    | app(X2,skaf45(X1,X2)) = X1 ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    ssList(skaf45(X1,X2)),
    clause51 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ frontsegP(X1,X2)
    | segmentP(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    co1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | neq(sk5,nil) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | frontsegP(sk3,sk5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | frontsegP(sk4,sk5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ frontsegP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    co1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | neq(sk5,nil) ),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | frontsegP(sk3,sk5) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | frontsegP(sk4,sk5) ),
    c_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk5) ),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ frontsegP(sk2,X1)
    | ~ frontsegP(sk1,X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,nil) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_30]),c_0_37])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk5,nil),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    frontsegP(sk1,sk5),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    frontsegP(sk2,sk5),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_24]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk5),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]),c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWC080-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:53:27 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/0.60  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.79/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.79/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2358386 completed with status 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.79/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.79/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.79/0.60  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.79/0.60  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.79/0.60  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 2358395 completed with status 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.79/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.79/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.79/0.60  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.79/0.60  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.79/0.60  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.79/0.60  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.79/0.60  
% 0.79/0.60  % Proof found!
% 0.79/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.79/0.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.79/0.60  % Parsed axioms                        : 203
% 0.79/0.60  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Initial clauses                      : 203
% 0.79/0.60  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 203
% 0.79/0.60  % Processed clauses                    : 1125
% 0.79/0.60  % ...of these trivial                  : 17
% 0.79/0.60  % ...subsumed                          : 307
% 0.79/0.60  % ...remaining for further processing  : 801
% 0.79/0.60  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 47
% 0.79/0.60  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Backward-subsumed                    : 22
% 0.79/0.60  % Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.79/0.60  % Generated clauses                    : 8413
% 0.79/0.60  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8004
% 0.79/0.60  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 36
% 0.79/0.60  % Paramodulations                      : 8114
% 0.79/0.60  % Factorizations                       : 182
% 0.79/0.60  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Equation resolutions                 : 113
% 0.79/0.60  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2658
% 0.79/0.60  % ...of those cached                   : 2443
% 0.79/0.60  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.79/0.60  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.79/0.60  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.79/0.60  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.79/0.60  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.79/0.60  % Current number of processed clauses  : 763
% 0.79/0.60  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 72
% 0.79/0.60  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.79/0.60  %    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 0.79/0.60  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 683
% 0.79/0.60  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7048
% 0.79/0.60  % ...number of literals in the above   : 26894
% 0.79/0.60  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Current number of archived clauses   : 33
% 0.79/0.60  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44327
% 0.79/0.60  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11233
% 0.79/0.60  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 302
% 0.79/0.60  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 892
% 0.79/0.60  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.79/0.60  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.79/0.60  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.79/0.60  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 140009
% 0.79/0.60  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 548
% 0.79/0.60  
% 0.79/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/0.60  % User time                : 0.147 s
% 0.79/0.60  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.79/0.60  % Total time               : 0.155 s
% 0.79/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 4068 pages
% 0.79/0.60  
% 0.79/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/0.60  % User time                : 0.743 s
% 0.79/0.60  % System time              : 0.052 s
% 0.79/0.60  % Total time               : 0.795 s
% 0.79/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.79/0.60  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------