↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:56:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 13.48s 2.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   21 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  160 (  56   ~;  48   |;  46   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn  13   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( ( neq(X,nil)
                      & ! [Z] :
                          ( ssList(Z)
                         => ( ~ segmentP(W,Z)
                            | ~ segmentP(X,Z)
                            | ~ neq(Z,nil) ) ) )
                    | ( nil = X
                      & nil != W )
                    | ? [Y] :
                        ( segmentP(U,Y)
                        & segmentP(V,Y)
                        & neq(Y,nil)
                        & ssList(Y) )
                    | ~ neq(V,nil)
                    | U != W
                    | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( ( neq(X,nil)
                        & ! [Z] :
                            ( ssList(Z)
                           => ( ~ segmentP(W,Z)
                              | ~ segmentP(X,Z)
                              | ~ neq(Z,nil) ) ) )
                      | ( nil = X
                        & nil != W )
                      | ? [Y] :
                          ( segmentP(U,Y)
                          & segmentP(V,Y)
                          & neq(Y,nil)
                          & ssList(Y) )
                      | ~ neq(V,nil)
                      | U != W
                      | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(nnf_87,plain,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X,nil)
                    | ? [Z] :
                        ( segmentP(W,Z)
                        & segmentP(X,Z)
                        & neq(Z,nil)
                        & ssList(Z) ) )
                  & ( nil != X
                    | nil = W )
                  & ! [Y] :
                      ( ~ segmentP(U,Y)
                      | ~ segmentP(V,Y)
                      | ~ neq(Y,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(Y) )
                  & neq(V,nil)
                  & W = U
                  & X = V
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | ( segmentP(sK0,sK1)
        & segmentP(sK2,sK1)
        & neq(sK1,nil)
        & ssList(sK1) ) )
    & ( nil != sK2
      | nil = sK0 )
    & ! [Y] :
        ( ~ segmentP(sK4,Y)
        | ~ segmentP(sK3,Y)
        | ~ neq(Y,nil)
        | ~ ssList(Y) )
    & neq(sK3,nil)
    & sK0 = sK4
    & sK2 = sK3
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK0)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK3,sK0,sK2,sK1]),skolemize(U,sK4),skolemize(V,sK3),skolemize(W,sK0),skolemize(X,sK2),skolemize(Z,sK1)],[nnf_87]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | segmentP(sK0,sK1) )
    & ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | segmentP(sK2,sK1) )
    & ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | neq(sK1,nil) )
    & ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | ssList(sK1) )
    & ( nil != sK2
      | nil = sK0 )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ segmentP(sK4,VAR_0)
        | ~ segmentP(sK3,VAR_0)
        | ~ neq(VAR_0,nil)
        | ~ ssList(VAR_0) )
    & neq(sK3,nil)
    & sK0 = sK4
    & sK2 = sK3
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK0)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_190,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | segmentP(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | segmentP(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_192,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | neq(sK1,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_193,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | ssList(sK1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_196,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sK4,A)
    | ~ segmentP(sK3,A)
    | ~ neq(A,nil)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_197,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK3,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_198,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = sK4,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_199,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2449,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | segmentP(sK4,sK1) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_190]) ).

cnf(c_2450,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | segmentP(sK4,sK1) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_2449]) ).

cnf(c_549,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(sK4,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_2450]) ).

cnf(c_2451,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ssList(sK1) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_193]) ).

cnf(c_550,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_2451]) ).

cnf(c_2452,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | neq(sK1,nil) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_192]) ).

cnf(c_551,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK1,nil),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_2452]) ).

cnf(c_2453,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | segmentP(sK3,sK1) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_191]) ).

cnf(c_2454,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | segmentP(sK3,sK1) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_2453]) ).

cnf(c_552,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(sK3,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_2454]) ).

cnf(c_2455,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sK3,sK1)
    | ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_549,c_196]) ).

cnf(c_2456,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sK3,sK1)
    | ~ neq(sK1,nil) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_550,c_2455]) ).

cnf(c_2457,negated_conjecture,
    ~ segmentP(sK3,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_551,c_2456]) ).

cnf(c_2448,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_552,c_2457]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SWC082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.41  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:12:16 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.16/0.42  % Process 2095566 was started by sandbox2 on n005,
% 0.16/0.42  % Sat Sep 26 12:12:16 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.16/0.46  
% 0.16/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 13.48/2.42  
% 13.48/2.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 13.48/2.42  
% 13.48/2.42  % Proof 1 at 1.72 (+ 0.20) seconds.
% 13.48/2.42  % Length of proof is 14.
% 13.48/2.42  % Level of proof is 3.
% 13.48/2.42  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 13.48/2.42  % Given clauses 353.
% 13.48/2.42  
% 13.48/2.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------