↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWC082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:07:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.50s 1.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  133 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  169 (  61   ~;  52   |;  46   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  17   !;  12   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                      & ! [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                         => ( ~ segmentP(X2,X5)
                            | ~ segmentP(X3,X5)
                            | ~ neq(X5,nil) ) ) )
                    | ( nil = X3
                      & nil != X2 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( segmentP(X0,X4)
                        & segmentP(X1,X4)
                        & neq(X4,nil)
                        & ssList(X4) )
                    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                        & ! [X5] :
                            ( ssList(X5)
                           => ( ~ segmentP(X2,X5)
                              | ~ segmentP(X3,X5)
                              | ~ neq(X5,nil) ) ) )
                      | ( nil = X3
                        & nil != X2 )
                      | ? [X4] :
                          ( segmentP(X0,X4)
                          & segmentP(X1,X4)
                          & neq(X4,nil)
                          & ssList(X4) )
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f96]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                        & segmentP(X2,X5)
                        & segmentP(X3,X5)
                        & neq(X5,nil) ) )
                  & ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                        & segmentP(X2,X5)
                        & segmentP(X3,X5)
                        & neq(X5,nil) ) )
                  & ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( ssList(sK53)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
      | ( ssList(sK57)
        & segmentP(sK55,sK57)
        & segmentP(sK56,sK57)
        & neq(sK57,nil) ) )
    & ( nil != sK56
      | nil = sK55 )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ~ segmentP(sK53,X4)
        | ~ segmentP(sK54,X4)
        | ~ neq(X4,nil)
        | ~ ssList(X4) )
    & neq(sK54,nil)
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56,sK57]),skolemize(X0,sK53),skolemize(X1,sK54),skolemize(X2,sK55),skolemize(X3,sK56),skolemize(X5,sK57)],[f222]) ).

fof(f500,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | ssList(sK57) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f501,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | segmentP(sK55,sK57) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f502,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | segmentP(sK56,sK57) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f503,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | neq(sK57,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f505,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ segmentP(sK53,X4)
      | ~ segmentP(sK54,X4)
      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f506,plain,
    neq(sK54,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f507,plain,
    sK53 = sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f508,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f509,plain,
    neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f506,f508]) ).

fof(f510,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ segmentP(sK55,X4)
      | ~ segmentP(sK56,X4)
      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f505,f508,f507]) ).

tcf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f509]) ).

tcf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ segmentP(sK55,X0)
      | ~ segmentP(sK56,X0)
      | ~ neq(X0,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f510]) ).

tcf(c_249,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sK57,nil)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f503]) ).

tcf(c_250,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(sK56,sK57)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f502]) ).

tcf(c_251,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(sK55,sK57)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f501]) ).

tcf(c_252,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(sK57)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f500]) ).

tcf(c_375,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK57,nil),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_249,c_246,c_249]) ).

tcf(c_3288,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ segmentP(sK55,X0)
      | ~ segmentP(sK56,X0)
      | ( nil != nil )
      | ( X0 != sK57 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_247,c_375]) ).

tcf(c_3289,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK57)
    | ~ segmentP(sK55,sK57)
    | ~ segmentP(sK56,sK57) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3288]) ).

tcf(c_3290,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_3289,c_250,c_251,c_252,c_246]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.54  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.54  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.54  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.54  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.54  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.54  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.54  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 16:19:34 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.55  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.55  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.58  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.58  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.59  
% 0.14/0.59  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.59  
% 0.14/0.59  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.61  % Proving...
% 2.50/1.47  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/1.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.50/1.47  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.50/1.47  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.50/1.47  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s% 
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.50/1.47  
% 2.50/1.47  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------