%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : SWC097+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 05:18:16 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.32s 1.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 20 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 79 ( 26 ~; 26 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn 11 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ? [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
& app(X1,cons(X5,nil)) = X2 )
| ! [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
=> app(X3,cons(X6,nil)) != X4 ) )
& ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ? [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
& app(X1,cons(X5,nil)) = X2 )
| ! [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
=> app(X3,cons(X6,nil)) != X4 ) )
& ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X464] :
( ssList(esk48_0)
& ssList(esk49_0)
& ssList(esk50_0)
& ssList(esk51_0)
& esk49_0 = esk51_0
& esk48_0 = esk50_0
& ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
| neq(esk49_0,nil) )
& ( ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
| neq(esk49_0,nil) )
& ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X464)
| app(esk48_0,cons(X464,nil)) != esk49_0 )
& ( ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X464)
| app(esk48_0,cons(X464,nil)) != esk49_0 )
& ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
| ssItem(esk52_0) )
& ( ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
| ssItem(esk52_0) )
& ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
| app(esk50_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)) = esk51_0 )
& ( ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
| app(esk50_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)) = esk51_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( neq(esk49_0,nil)
| neq(esk49_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| app(esk48_0,cons(X1,nil)) != esk49_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk49_0,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( app(esk50_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)) = esk51_0
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 = esk50_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk52_0)
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( app(esk48_0,cons(X1,nil)) != esk49_0
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
app(esk48_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)) = esk49_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_5]),c_0_5]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(esk52_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWC097+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 5 04:25:11 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.32/1.73 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.32/1.73 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.32/1.73 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.32/1.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.32/1.73 % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------