↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC100-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   46 (  17 unt;   3 nHn;  46 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  109 (  40 equ;  66 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk3
    | nil = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

cnf(clause115,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause115) ).

cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(clause144,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != X3
    | frontsegP(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause144) ).

cnf(clause85,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause85) ).

cnf(co1_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ frontsegP(sk2,sk1)
    | ~ neq(sk1,nil)
    | nil = sk2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).

cnf(clause100,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause100) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk3,sk5) = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(clause118,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause118) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk3
    | nil = sk4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause115]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk3
    | nil = sk4 ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != X3
    | frontsegP(X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause144]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause85]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( sk1 != nil
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ frontsegP(sk2,sk1)
    | ~ neq(sk1,nil)
    | nil = sk2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause100]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != X3
    | frontsegP(X3,X1) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk3,sk5) = sk4,
    co1_8 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause118]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( sk1 != nil
    | neq(nil,nil) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ frontsegP(sk2,sk1)
    | ~ neq(sk1,nil)
    | nil = sk2 ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    co1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | frontsegP(app(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk1,sk5) = sk2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_19]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk5),
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 != nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ frontsegP(sk2,sk1)
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_33])]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    frontsegP(sk2,sk1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 != nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_36])]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]),c_0_44]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC100-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:57:28 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % new_bool_3 with pid 1390195 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1390203 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 200
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 124
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 76
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 76
% 0.10/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 79
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.10/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 71
% 0.10/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 0.10/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 8
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.10/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 47
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.10/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.10/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 38
% 0.10/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 0.10/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 50
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 42
% 0.10/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 50
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.10/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 32
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.10/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 159
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.10/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 357
% 0.10/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125
% 0.10/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 0.10/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.10/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 5204
% 0.10/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 864
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4068 pages
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------