↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNK-Non.f

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWC102-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.00s 1.21s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWC102-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 20:56:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43  The process was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43  Sat Jun 11 20:56:52 2022
% 0.19/0.43  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5789.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43  136 back subsumes 135.
% 0.19/0.43  146 back subsumes 140.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43    Following clause subsumed by 430 during input processing: 0 [copy,430,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 333.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 277.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 276.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 275.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 265.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 252.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 251.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 250.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 213.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 201.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 200.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 199.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 198.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 181.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 178.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 176.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 172.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 169.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 144.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 143.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 142.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 134.
% 0.19/0.43  430 back subsumes 133.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.42/0.63  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.42/0.63  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.42/0.63  number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.42/0.63  number of clauses initially in problem: 396
% 0.42/0.63  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.42/0.63  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.42/0.63  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.42/0.63  absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.42/0.63     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.42/0.63     distinct function count: 46
% 0.42/0.63     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.00/1.21  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.00/1.21  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.00/1.21  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  true clauses given           1      (16.7%)
% 1.00/1.21  false clauses given          5
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.00/1.21     2  2         3
% 1.00/1.21     3  43        2
% 1.00/1.21     4  7         0
% 1.00/1.21     5  1         0
% 1.00/1.21     7  0         29
% 1.00/1.21     9  0         21
% 1.00/1.21    10  0         2
% 1.00/1.21    11  1         43
% 1.00/1.21    12  0         18
% 1.00/1.21    13  0         25
% 1.00/1.21    14  0         8
% 1.00/1.21    15  0         22
% 1.00/1.21    16  0         14
% 1.00/1.21    17  0         12
% 1.00/1.21    19  0         6
% 1.00/1.21    21  0         18
% 1.00/1.21    22  0         10
% 1.00/1.21    23  0         6
% 1.00/1.21  tot:  54        239      (81.6% true)
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.00/1.21  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.00/1.21  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.00/1.21  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  
% 1.00/1.21  The job finished Sat Jun 11 20:56:52 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------