↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC121+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:56:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 10.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  113 (  40   ~;  32   |;  33   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( ( ( neq(X,nil)
                        | ~ neq(V,nil) )
                      & ( ( segmentP(V,U)
                          & neq(U,nil) )
                        | ~ segmentP(X,W)
                        | ~ neq(W,nil)
                        | ~ neq(V,nil) ) )
                    | U != W
                    | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X,nil)
                          | ~ neq(V,nil) )
                        & ( ( segmentP(V,U)
                            & neq(U,nil) )
                          | ~ segmentP(X,W)
                          | ~ neq(W,nil)
                          | ~ neq(V,nil) ) )
                      | U != W
                      | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(nnf_87,plain,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X,nil)
                      & neq(V,nil) )
                    | ( ( ~ segmentP(V,U)
                        | ~ neq(U,nil) )
                      & segmentP(X,W)
                      & neq(W,nil)
                      & neq(V,nil) ) )
                  & W = U
                  & X = V
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
        & neq(sK1,nil) )
      | ( ( ~ segmentP(sK1,sK0)
          | ~ neq(sK0,nil) )
        & segmentP(sK2,sK3)
        & neq(sK3,nil)
        & neq(sK1,nil) ) )
    & sK3 = sK0
    & sK2 = sK1
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK3,sK2]),skolemize(U,sK0),skolemize(V,sK1),skolemize(W,sK3),skolemize(X,sK2)],[nnf_87]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | ~ segmentP(sK1,sK0)
      | ~ neq(sK0,nil) )
    & ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | segmentP(sK2,sK3) )
    & ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
      | neq(sK3,nil) )
    & neq(sK1,nil)
    & sK3 = sK0
    & sK2 = sK1
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_190,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ neq(sK0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | segmentP(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_192,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | neq(sK3,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_193,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK1,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_194,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_195,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_547,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | neq(sK0,nil) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_192]) ).

cnf(c_548,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | neq(sK0,nil) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_547]) ).

cnf(c_544,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK0,nil),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_548]) ).

cnf(c_549,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | segmentP(sK1,sK3) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_191]) ).

cnf(c_550,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | segmentP(sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_549]) ).

cnf(c_551,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | segmentP(sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_550]) ).

cnf(c_545,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_551]) ).

cnf(c_552,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ neq(sK0,nil) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_190]) ).

cnf(c_553,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_544,c_552]) ).

cnf(c_554,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sK1,nil),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_545,c_553]) ).

cnf(c_546,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_554]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWC121+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.44  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/10.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/10.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/10.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/10.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/10.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/10.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/10.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:20:51 UTC 2026
% 0.15/10.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/10.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/10.44  % Process 947528 was started by sandbox2 on n026,
% 0.15/10.44  % Sat Sep 26 12:20:51 2026
% 0.15/10.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/10.47  
% 0.15/10.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.19/10.60  
% 0.19/10.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/10.60  
% 0.19/10.60  % Proof 1 at 0.13 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.19/10.60  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.19/10.60  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.19/10.60  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.19/10.60  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.19/10.60  
% 0.19/10.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------