↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWC121+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:04:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  34   ~;  32   |;  34   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   8   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( X1 != X3
                    | X0 != X2
                    | ( ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                        | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
                        | ( neq(X0,nil)
                          & segmentP(X1,X0) ) )
                      & ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                        | neq(X3,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( X1 != X3
                      | X0 != X2
                      | ( ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                          | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
                          | ( neq(X0,nil)
                            & segmentP(X1,X0) ) )
                        & ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                          | neq(X3,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f96]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & neq(X2,nil)
                      & segmentP(X3,X2)
                      & ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                        | ~ segmentP(X1,X0) ) )
                    | ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & neq(X2,nil)
                      & segmentP(X3,X2)
                      & ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                        | ~ segmentP(X1,X0) ) )
                    | ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( sK54 = sK56
    & sK53 = sK55
    & ( ( neq(sK54,nil)
        & neq(sK55,nil)
        & segmentP(sK56,sK55)
        & ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
          | ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53) ) )
      | ( neq(sK54,nil)
        & ~ neq(sK56,nil) ) )
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK53) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56]),skolemize(X0,sK53),skolemize(X1,sK54),skolemize(X2,sK55),skolemize(X3,sK56)],[f222]) ).

fof(f500,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f501,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
    | neq(sK54,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f502,plain,
    ( segmentP(sK56,sK55)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f503,plain,
    ( segmentP(sK56,sK55)
    | neq(sK54,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f504,plain,
    ( neq(sK55,nil)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f505,plain,
    ( neq(sK55,nil)
    | neq(sK54,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f508,plain,
    sK53 = sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f509,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f512,plain,
    ( neq(sK55,nil)
    | neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f505,f509]) ).

fof(f513,plain,
    ( segmentP(sK56,sK55)
    | neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f503,f509]) ).

fof(f514,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK55,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sK56,sK55)
    | neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f501,f508,f509,f508,f509]) ).

fof(f515,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK55,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sK56,sK55)
    | ~ neq(sK56,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f500,f508,f509,f508]) ).

fof(f554,plain,
    $false,
    inference(global_subsumption,[],[f512,f504,f513,f502,f514,f515]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC121+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 07:59:31 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619157)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619169)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3542275109_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619170)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619174)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2044857114:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619173)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1861745529:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619170)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2567057651:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619172)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=1473332189:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1807819469:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.13/0.48  % TRYING [1]
% 0.13/0.48  % TRYING [2]
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1619157-1619171"...
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619172) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1619157-1619172"...
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619170) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1619157-1619170"...
% 0.13/0.48  % TRYING [3]
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)...printing done.
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619172)...printing done.
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619170)...printing done.
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619171)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.13/0.48  % (1619157)Success in time 0.054 s
% 0.13/0.48  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------