↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SWC121-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PusRlDqh4e true

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:58:41 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  21   ~;  12   |;   0   &;  56   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nil_type,type,
    nil: $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(neq_type,type,
    neq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(segmentP_type,type,
    segmentP: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(co1_14,conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
      | ~ ( segmentP @ sk2 @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( neq @ sk1 @ nil ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
    | ~ ( segmentP @ sk2 @ sk1 )
    | ~ ( neq @ sk1 @ nil ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co1_14]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl29,plain,
    ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
    | ~ ( segmentP @ sk2 @ sk1 )
    | ~ ( neq @ sk1 @ nil ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(co1_5,conjecture,
    sk2 != sk4 ).

thf(zf_stmt_1,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co1_5]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl38,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).

thf(co1_7,conjecture,
    ~ ( neq @ sk2 @ nil ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_2,negated_conjecture,
    neq @ sk2 @ nil,
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co1_7]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl36,plain,
    neq @ sk2 @ nil,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_2]) ).

thf(co1_13,conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
      | ( segmentP @ sk4 @ sk3 ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
    | ( segmentP @ sk4 @ sk3 ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co1_13]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl30,plain,
    ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
    | ( segmentP @ sk4 @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl38_001,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl36_002,plain,
    neq @ sk2 @ nil,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl38_003,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).

thf(co1_6,conjecture,
    sk1 != sk3 ).

thf(zf_stmt_4,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co1_6]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl37,plain,
    sk1 = sk3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_4]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl229,plain,
    segmentP @ sk2 @ sk1,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl30,zip_derived_cl38,zip_derived_cl36,zip_derived_cl38,zip_derived_cl37]) ).

thf(co1_12,conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
      | ( neq @ sk3 @ nil ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
    | ( neq @ sk3 @ nil ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co1_12]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl31,plain,
    ( ~ ( neq @ sk4 @ nil )
    | ( neq @ sk3 @ nil ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_5]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl38_004,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl36_005,plain,
    neq @ sk2 @ nil,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl37_006,plain,
    sk1 = sk3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_4]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl230,plain,
    neq @ sk1 @ nil,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl31,zip_derived_cl38,zip_derived_cl36,zip_derived_cl37]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl245,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl29,zip_derived_cl38,zip_derived_cl36,zip_derived_cl229,zip_derived_cl230]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09  % Problem  : SWC121-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PusRlDqh4e true
% 0.09/0.31  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.31  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 17:09:38 EDT 2025
% 0.09/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.31  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.09/0.31  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.31  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.09/0.32  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.09/0.32  % Running in FO mode
% 0.43/0.60  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.43/0.60  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.43/0.60  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.49/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.49/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.74  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.49/0.74  % BCE start: 43
% 0.49/0.74  % BCE eliminated: 9
% 0.49/0.74  % PE start: 34
% 0.49/0.74  logic: eq
% 0.49/0.74  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.49/0.74  % done 20 iterations in 0.018s
% 0.49/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.49/0.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.74  
% 0.49/0.74  
% 0.49/0.74  % Terminating...
% 1.65/0.81  % Runner terminated.
% 1.65/0.82  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------