%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWC127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 89 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 100 ( 38 ~; 28 |; 16 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ( segmentP(X2,X1)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( neq(X4,nil)
& ~ singletonP(X3) )
| ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(ax15,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).
fof(ax39,axiom,
~ singletonP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax39) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ( segmentP(X2,X1)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( neq(X4,nil)
& ~ singletonP(X3) )
| ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ( segmentP(X2,X1)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( neq(X4,nil)
& ~ singletonP(X3) )
| ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| ~ neq(esk1_0,nil) )
& ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
| singletonP(esk3_0) )
& segmentP(esk4_0,esk3_0)
& neq(esk2_0,nil)
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& ssList(esk4_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk1_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
segmentP(esk4_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax15]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk2_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| ~ neq(esk1_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
segmentP(esk4_0,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X31,X32] :
( ( ~ ssList(X31)
| ~ ssList(X32)
| neq(X31,X32)
| X31 = X32 )
& ( ~ ssList(X31)
| ~ ssList(X32)
| X31 != X32
| ~ neq(X31,X32) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
~ singletonP(nil),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax39]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
| singletonP(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk4_0,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk1_0,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| neq(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
~ singletonP(nil),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
singletonP(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_8]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ singletonP(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWC127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:00:36 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % new_bool_1 with pid 1786618 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1786620 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 68
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses : 52
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 52
% 0.12/0.45 % Processed clauses : 34
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.12/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.12/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Generated clauses : 6
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.12/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.12/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.12/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 20
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of those cached : 12
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.12/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 95
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
% 0.12/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5024
% 0.12/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1534
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3756 pages
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------