↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWC134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:08:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named f225ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_6086ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(f60,axiom,
    cyclefreeP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax60) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( cyclefreeP(X1)
                    | neq(X3,nil)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( cyclefreeP(X1)
                      | neq(X3,nil)
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f96]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ssList(X1)
          | ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0)
      | ( ( ~ cyclefreeP(X0)
          | sP0(X0) )
        & ( ~ sP0(X0)
          | cyclefreeP(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f224]) ).

fof(f273,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ssList(X1)
          | ( ( ~ neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 != X1 )
            & ( X0 = X1
              | neq(X0,X1) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( ssList(sK53)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ~ cyclefreeP(sK54)
    & ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56]),skolemize(X0,sK53),skolemize(X1,sK54),skolemize(X2,sK55),skolemize(X3,sK56)],[f222]) ).

fof(f319,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0)
      | ~ cyclefreeP(X0)
      | sP0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f249]) ).

fof(f320,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0)
      | ~ sP0(X0)
      | cyclefreeP(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f249]) ).

fof(f330,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | sP1(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f225]) ).

fof(f387,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | neq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f273]) ).

fof(f389,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f446,plain,
    cyclefreeP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f497,plain,
    ssList(sK54),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f500,plain,
    ~ cyclefreeP(sK54),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f501,plain,
    ~ neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f503,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f504,plain,
    ~ cyclefreeP(sK56),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f500,f503]) ).

fof(f505,plain,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f497,f503]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( cyclefreeP(X0)
      | ~ sP1(X0)
      | ~ sP0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f320]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sP0(X0)
      | ~ sP1(X0)
      | ~ cyclefreeP(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f319]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sP1(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f330]) ).

tcf(c_138,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f387]) ).

tcf(c_141,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f389]) ).

tcf(c_198,plain,
    cyclefreeP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f446]) ).

tcf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f501]) ).

tcf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cyclefreeP(sK56),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f504]) ).

tcf(c_250,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f505]) ).

tcf(c_264,plain,
    ( sP1(nil)
    | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_82]) ).

tcf(c_291,plain,
    ( sP0(nil)
    | ~ sP1(nil)
    | ~ cyclefreeP(nil) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_2981,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sP0(X1)
      | ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_72]) ).

tcf(c_2982,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sP0(X0)
      | ~ cyclefreeP(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_2981]) ).

tcf(c_2993,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( cyclefreeP(X1)
      | ~ sP0(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_2994,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( cyclefreeP(X0)
      | ~ sP0(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_2993]) ).

tcf(c_3176,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sP0(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ( X0 != nil ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_2982,c_198]) ).

tcf(c_3177,plain,
    ( sP0(nil)
    | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3176]) ).

tcf(c_3178,plain,
    sP0(nil),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3177,c_198,c_141,c_264,c_291]) ).

tcf(c_3183,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ( X0 != sK56 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_2994,c_247]) ).

tcf(c_3184,plain,
    ( ~ sP0(sK56)
    | ~ ssList(sK56) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3183]) ).

tcf(c_3185,plain,
    ~ sP0(sK56),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3184,c_250,c_3184]) ).

tcf(c_3218,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ( X1 != nil )
      | ( X0 != sK56 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_246]) ).

tcf(c_3219,plain,
    ( ( sK56 = nil )
    | ~ ssList(sK56)
    | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3218]) ).

tcf(c_3220,plain,
    sK56 = nil,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3219,c_250,c_141,c_3219]) ).

tcf(c_6084,plain,
    ~ sP0(nil),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3185,c_3220]) ).

tcf(c_6086,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6084,c_3178]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 16:35:24 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.44  % Proving...
% 0.44/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.44/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.44/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.44/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e % 
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.44/1.29  
% 0.44/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------