%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SWC136+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:51 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 13.16s 2.53s % Output : Proof 20.06s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWC136+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % 0.10/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 16:58:25 EDT 2023 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 5.73/1.47 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 5.73/1.49 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 5.73/1.50 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 5.73/1.50 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 5.73/1.50 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 5.73/1.50 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 5.73/1.50 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 13.16/2.50 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 13.16/2.53 Prover 2: proved (1901ms) % 13.16/2.53 % 13.16/2.53 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 13.16/2.53 % 13.16/2.54 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 14.48/2.71 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.48/2.71 Prover 5: stopped % 14.48/2.71 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 15.42/2.81 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 15.42/2.81 Prover 3: stopped % 15.42/2.83 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 15.42/2.83 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 15.97/2.85 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 15.97/2.85 Prover 6: stopped % 15.97/2.87 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 16.61/2.96 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 16.61/2.98 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 16.61/2.99 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1) % 16.61/2.99 Prover 1: proved (2361ms) % 17.04/3.01 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 17.04/3.06 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 17.77/3.11 Prover 10: stopped % 18.12/3.14 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.12/3.14 Prover 7: stopped % 18.27/3.15 Prover 11: stopped % 19.09/3.34 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.09/3.34 Prover 0: stopped % 19.59/3.37 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 19.73/3.39 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.73/3.39 Prover 8: stopped % 19.97/3.43 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.97/3.43 Prover 4: stopped % 19.97/3.43 % 19.97/3.43 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 19.97/3.43 % 19.97/3.44 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 19.97/3.44 Assumptions after simplification: % 19.97/3.44 --------------------------------- % 19.97/3.44 % 19.97/3.44 (co1) % 20.06/3.44 $false % 20.06/3.45 % 20.06/3.45 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 20.06/3.45 -------------------------------------------- % 20.06/3.45 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20, % 20.06/3.45 ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32, % 20.06/3.45 ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, % 20.06/3.45 ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56, % 20.06/3.45 ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68, % 20.06/3.45 ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8, % 20.06/3.45 ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91, % 20.06/3.45 ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95 % 20.06/3.45 % 20.06/3.45 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 20.06/3.45 --------------------------------- % 20.06/3.45 % 20.06/3.45 Begin of proof % 20.06/3.45 | % 20.06/3.45 | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent. % 20.06/3.45 | % 20.06/3.45 End of proof % 20.06/3.45 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 20.06/3.45 % 20.06/3.45 2844ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------