%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem : SWC141-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:01:34 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.95s 2.24s
% Output : Proof 1.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 8 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(sk4,nil),
file('theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(equality_1,axiom,
Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).
cnf(equality_67,axiom,
( neq(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
| ~ neq(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1)
| Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
| Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).
cnf(t1,plain,
~ neq(sk4,nil),
inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[co1_8]) ).
cnf(t2,plain,
( nil != nil
| ~ neq(sk2,nil)
| sk2 != sk4
| neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_67]) ).
cnf(t3,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).
cnf(t4,plain,
sk2 = sk4,
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[co1_5]) ).
cnf(t5,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).
cnf(t6,plain,
neq(sk2,nil),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(t7,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t2:3]) ).
cnf(t8,plain,
nil = nil,
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:4)],[equality_1]) ).
cnf(t9,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t2:4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWC141-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 01:56:08 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 1.95/2.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.95/2.24 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------