↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SWC151+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:01:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.94s 7.28s
% Output   : Proof 1.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   87 (  20   ~;  10   |;  49   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn   8   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( totalorderP(X)
                    | ~ totalorderP(V)
                    | U != W
                    | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f_96_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( totalorderP(X)
                      | ~ totalorderP(V)
                      | U != W
                      | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(f_96_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ~ totalorderP(X)
                  & totalorderP(V)
                  & U = W
                  & V = X
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_96_1]) ).

fof(f_96_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_247] :
      ( ? [U_246] :
          ( ? [U_245] :
              ( ? [U_244] :
                  ( ~ totalorderP(U_244)
                  & totalorderP(U_246)
                  & U_247 = U_245
                  & U_246 = U_244
                  & ssList(U_244) )
              & ssList(U_245) )
          & ssList(U_246) )
      & ssList(U_247) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_96_2]) ).

fof(f_96_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_246] :
        ( ? [U_245] :
            ( ? [U_244] :
                ( ~ totalorderP(U_244)
                & totalorderP(U_246)
                & sK48 = U_245
                & U_246 = U_244
                & ssList(U_244) )
            & ssList(U_245) )
        & ssList(U_246) )
    & ssList(sK48) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK48]),skolemize(U_247,sK48)],[f_96_3]) ).

fof(f_96_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_245] :
        ( ? [U_244] :
            ( ~ totalorderP(U_244)
            & totalorderP(sK49)
            & sK48 = U_245
            & sK49 = U_244
            & ssList(U_244) )
        & ssList(U_245) )
    & ssList(sK49)
    & ssList(sK48) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK49]),skolemize(U_246,sK49)],[f_96_4]) ).

fof(f_96_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_244] :
        ( ~ totalorderP(U_244)
        & totalorderP(sK49)
        & sK48 = sK50
        & sK49 = U_244
        & ssList(U_244) )
    & ssList(sK50)
    & ssList(sK49)
    & ssList(sK48) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK50]),skolemize(U_245,sK50)],[f_96_5]) ).

fof(f_96_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ totalorderP(sK51)
    & totalorderP(sK49)
    & sK48 = sK50
    & sK49 = sK51
    & ssList(sK51)
    & ssList(sK50)
    & ssList(sK49)
    & ssList(sK48) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK51]),skolemize(U_244,sK51)],[f_96_6]) ).

fof(f_96_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ totalorderP(sK51)
    & totalorderP(sK49)
    & sK48 = sK50
    & sK49 = sK51
    & ssList(sK51)
    & ssList(sK50)
    & ssList(sK49)
    & ssList(sK48) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_96_7]) ).

cnf(f_96_13,negated_conjecture,
    sK49 = sK51,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_96_8]) ).

cnf(f_96_15,negated_conjecture,
    totalorderP(sK49),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_96_8]) ).

cnf(f_96_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ totalorderP(sK51),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_96_8]) ).

cnf(equality_63,axiom,
    ( totalorderP(Eq_y_0)
    | ~ totalorderP(Eq_x_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ totalorderP(sK51),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_96_16]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ totalorderP(sK49)
    | sK49 != sK51
    | totalorderP(sK51) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_63]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    sK49 = sK51,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_96_13]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    totalorderP(sK49),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[f_96_15]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t2:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC151+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/5.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 01:56:52 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.94/7.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.94/7.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------